arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2011.08875hep-thmath-phmath.MPquant-ph
收藏

关于Haag定理和重整化二义性

On Haag's theorem and renormalization ambiguities

Alessio Maiezza, Juan Carlos Vasquez

摘要:

我们根据重整化群重新审视哈格定理的含义。关于这个定理对标准(与公理相反)量子场论的可能影响,在文献中仍然缺乏讨论,我们试图在这个方向上阐明。我们的讨论,然后处理哈格定理和重整化之间的相互作用。虽然我们澄清了如何微扰重整化(为子类的相互作用,可重整化)边际化的影响时,耦合是正式小,我们认为,一个非微扰和非模糊的重整化不能建立,如果有任何参考的相互作用图片与自由场。换句话说,Haag定理应被视为从微扰到非微扰QFT的非二义性解析延拓的存在性的不可行定理。

英文摘要:

We revisit the implications of Haag's theorem in the light of the renormalization group. There is still some lack of discussion in the literature about the possible impact of the theorem on the standard (as opposite of axiomatic) quantum field theory, and we try to shed light in this direction. Our discussion then deals with the interplay between Haag's theorem and renormalization. While we clarify how perturbative renormalization (for the sub-class of interactions that are renormalizable) marginalizes the its impact when the coupling is formally small, we argue that a non-perturbative and non-ambiguous renormalization cannot be built if there is any reference to the interaction picture with free fields. In other words, Haag's theorem should be regarded as a no-go theorem for the existence of a non-ambiguous analytic continuation from perturbative to non-perturbative QFT.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑