Recently developed physics-informed neural network (PINN) has achieved success in many science and engineering disciplines by encoding physics laws into the loss functions of the neural network, such that the network not only conforms to the measurements, initial and boundary conditions but also satisfies the governing equations. This work first investigates the performance of PINN in solving stiff chemical kinetic problems with governing equations of stiff ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The results elucidate the challenges of utilizing PINN in stiff ODE systems. Consequently, we employ Quasi-Steady-State-Assumptions (QSSA) to reduce the stiffness of the ODE systems, and the PINN then can be successfully applied to the converted non/mild-stiff systems. Therefore, the results suggest that stiffness could be the major reason for the failure of the regular PINN in the studied stiff chemical kinetic systems. The developed Stiff-PINN approach that utilizes QSSA to enable PINN to solve stiff chemical kinetics shall open the possibility of applying PINN to various reaction-diffusion systems involving stiff dynamics.
The physics informed neural networks (PINNs) has been widely utilized to numerically approximate PDE problems. While PINNs has achieved good results in producing solutions for many partial differential equations, studies have shown that it does not perform well on phase field models. In this paper, we partially address this issue by introducing a modified physics informed neural networks. In particular, they are used to numerically approximate Allen-Cahn-Ohta-Kawasaki (ACOK) equation with a volume constraint.
We propose a novel algorithm, based on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to efficiently approximate solutions of nonlinear dispersive PDEs such as the KdV-Kawahara, Camassa-Holm and Benjamin-Ono equations. The stability of solutions of these dispersive PDEs is leveraged to prove rigorous bounds on the resulting error. We present several numerical experiments to demonstrate that PINNs can approximate solutions of these dispersive PDEs very accurately
Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have recently gained popularity for solving partial differential equations, given the fact they escape the curse of dimensionality. In this paper, we present Physics Informed Neural Networks as an underdetermined point matching collocation method then expose the connection between Galerkin Least Square (GALS) and PINNs, to develop an a priori error estimate, in the context of elliptic problems. In particular, techniques that belong to the realm of least square finite elements and Rademacher complexity analysis are used to obtain the error estimate.
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as an effective technique for solving PDEs in a wide range of domains. It is noticed, however, the performance of PINNs can vary dramatically with different sampling procedures. For instance, a fixed set of (prior chosen) training points may fail to capture the effective solution region (especially for problems with singularities). To overcome this issue, we present in this work an adaptive strategy, termed the failure-informed PINNs (FI-PINNs), which is inspired by the viewpoint of reliability analysis. The key idea is to define an effecti…
Physics-informed neural network (PINN) is a data-driven approach to solve equations. It is successful in many applications; however, the accuracy of the PINN is not satisfactory when it is used to solve multiscale equations. Homogenization is a way of approximating a multiscale equation by a homogenized equation without multiscale property; it includes solving cell problems and the homogenized equation. The cell problems are periodic; and we propose an oversampling strategy which greatly improves the PINN accuracy on periodic problems. The homogenized equation has constant or slow dependency c…
A physics informed neural network (PINN) incorporates the physics of a system by satisfying its boundary value problem through a neural network's loss function. The PINN approach has shown great success in approximating the map between the solution of a partial differential equation (PDE) and its spatio-temporal input. However, for strongly non-linear and higher order partial differential equations PINN's accuracy reduces significantly. To resolve this problem, we propose a novel PINN scheme that solves the PDE sequentially over successive time segments using a single neural network. The key i…
A Framework Integrating the Dynamic Stiffness Matrix with Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Eigenvalue Problems and Analysing Dynamic Response
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology（香港科技大学）；Tongji University（同济大学）；Southwest Jiaotong University（西南交通大学）；Université Paris-Saclay（巴黎萨克雷大学）；Chongqing University（重庆大学）；Cardiff University（卡迪夫大学）
Physics informed neural networks approximate solutions of PDEs by minimizing pointwise residuals. We derive rigorous bounds on the error, incurred by PINNs in approximating the solutions of a large class of linear parabolic PDEs, namely Kolmogorov equations that include the heat equation and Black-Scholes equation of option pricing, as examples. We construct neural networks, whose PINN residual (generalization error) can be made as small as desired. We also prove that the total $L^2$-error can be bounded by the generalization error, which in turn is bounded in terms of the training error, prov…
In this paper, we introduce a new deep learning framework for discovering the phase field models from existing image data. The new framework embraces the approximation power of physics informed neural networks (PINN), and the computational efficiency of the pseudo-spectral methods, which we named pseudo-spectral PINN or SPINN. Unlike the baseline PINN, the pseudo-spectral PINN has several advantages. First of all, it requires less training data. A minimum of two snapshots with uniform spatial resolution would be adequate. Secondly, it is computationally efficient, as the pseudo-spectral method…
FO-PINNs: A First-Order formulation for Physics Informed Neural Networks
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign（伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校）；NVIDIA（英伟达）；University of California Davis（加州大学戴维斯分校）；Illinois Institute of Technology（伊利诺伊理工学院）
CASUS - Center for Advanced System Understanding（先进系统理解中心）；Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf e.V. (HZDR)（亥姆霍兹德累斯顿罗森多夫研究中心）
We present a novel class of approximations for variational losses, being applicable for the training of physics-informed neural nets (PINNs). The loss formulation reflects classic Sobolev space theory for partial differential equations and their weak formulations. The loss computation rests on an extension of Gauss-Legendre cubatures, we term Sobolev cubatures, replacing automatic differentiation (A.D.). We prove the runtime complexity of training the resulting Soblev-PINNs (SC-PINNs) to be less than required by PINNs relying on A.D. On top of one-to-two order of magnitude speed-up the SC-PINN…
Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are shown to be a promising method for the approximation of Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). PINNs approximate the PDE solution by minimizing physics-based loss functions over a given domain. Despite substantial progress in the application of PINNs to a range of problem classes, investigation of error estimation and convergence properties of PINNs, which is important for establishing the rationale behind their good empirical performance, has been lacking. This paper presents convergence analysis and error estimates of PINNs for a multi-physics pro…
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics（南京航空航天大学）
Although physics-informed neural networks(PINNs) have progressed a lot in many real applications recently, there remains problems to be further studied, such as achieving more accurate results, taking less training time, and quantifying the uncertainty of the predicted results. Recent advances in PINNs have indeed significantly improved the performance of PINNs in many aspects, but few have considered the effect of variance in the training process. In this work, we take into consideration the effect of variance and propose our VI-PINNs to give better predictions. We output two values in the fi…
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) leverage neural-networks to find the solutions of partial differential equation (PDE)-constrained optimization problems with initial conditions and boundary conditions as soft constraints. These soft constraints are often considered to be the sources of the complexity in the training phase of PINNs. Here, we demonstrate that the challenge of training (i) persists even when the boundary conditions are strictly enforced, and (ii) is closely related to the Kolmogorov n-width associated with problems demonstrating transport, convection, traveling waves, or …
A scaled TW-PINN: A physics-informed neural network for traveling wave solutions of reaction-diffusion equations with general coefficients
Department of Mathematics \& POSTECH MINDS (Mathematical Institute for Data Science), Pohang University of Science；Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence \& POSTECH MINDS (Mathematical Institute for Data Science), Pohang University of Science
Motivated by recent research on Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), we make the first attempt to introduce the PINNs for numerical simulation of the elliptic Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) on 3D manifolds. PINNs are one of the deep learning-based techniques. Based on the data and physical models, PINNs introduce the standard feedforward neural networks (NNs) to approximate the solutions to the PDE systems. By using automatic differentiation, the PDEs system could be explicitly encoded into NNs and consequently, the sum of mean squared residuals from PDEs could be minimized with re…
This is the second part of our series works on failure-informed adaptive sampling for physic-informed neural networks (FI-PINNs). In our previous work \cite{gao2022failure}, we have presented an adaptive sampling framework by using the failure probability as the posterior error indicator, where the truncated Gaussian model has been adopted for estimating the indicator. In this work, we present two novel extensions to FI-PINNs. The first extension consist in combining with a re-sampling technique, so that the new algorithm can maintain a constant training size. This is achieved through a cosine…
CI-PINN: Causal Integral Physics-Informed Neural Network for Solving Evolution Equations
Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University（北京师范大学-香港浸会大学联合国际学院）；Beijing Normal University（北京师范大学）；Guangzhou Nanfang College（广州南方学院）；Louisiana State University（路易斯安那州立大学）；Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences（中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院）
ETH Zürich（苏黎世联邦理工学院）；ETH AI Center（苏黎世联邦理工学院人工智能中心）
We propose a very general framework for deriving rigorous bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and operator learning architectures such as DeepONets and FNOs as well as for physics-informed operator learning. These bounds guarantee that PINNs and (physics-informed) DeepONets or FNOs will efficiently approximate the underlying solution or solution operator of generic partial differential equations (PDEs). Our framework utilizes existing neural network approximation results to obtain bounds on more involved learning architectures for PDEs. We illustrate …
Defense Innovation Institute, Chinese Academy of Military Science（军事科学院国防创新研究院）
Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) is a scientific computing framework used to solve both forward and inverse problems modeled by Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). This paper introduces IDRLnet, a Python toolbox for modeling and solving problems through PINN systematically. IDRLnet constructs the framework for a wide range of PINN algorithms and applications. It provides a structured way to incorporate geometric objects, data sources, artificial neural networks, loss metrics, and optimizers within Python. Furthermore, it provides functionality to solve noisy inverse problems, variatio…
We consider the approximation of a class of dynamic partial differential equations (PDE) of second order in time by the physics-informed neural network (PINN) approach, and provide an error analysis of PINN for the wave equation, the Sine-Gordon equation and the linear elastodynamic equation. Our analyses show that, with feed-forward neural networks having two hidden layers and the $\tanh$ activation function, the PINN approximation errors for the solution field, its time derivative and its gradient field can be effectively bounded by the training loss and the number of training data points (q…
Defense Innovation Institute, Chinese Academy of Military Science（中国人民解放军军事科学院国防科技创新研究院）；College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology（国防科技大学空天科学学院）
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been proposed to solve two main classes of problems: data-driven solutions and data-driven discovery of partial differential equations. This task becomes prohibitive when such data is highly corrupted due to the possible sensor mechanism failing. We propose the Least Absolute Deviation based PINN (LAD-PINN) to reconstruct the solution and recover unknown parameters in PDEs - even if spurious data or outliers corrupt a large percentage of the observations. To further improve the accuracy of recovering hidden physics, the two-stage Median Absolute De…
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)（新加坡科技研究局（A*STAR））；Nanyang Technological University（南洋理工大学）
In this study, novel physics-informed neural network (PINN) methods for coupling neighboring support points and their derivative terms which are obtained by automatic differentiation (AD), are proposed to allow efficient training with improved accuracy. The computation of differential operators required for PINNs loss evaluation at collocation points are conventionally obtained via AD. Although AD has the advantage of being able to compute the exact gradients at any point, such PINNs can only achieve high accuracies with large numbers of collocation points, otherwise they are prone to optimizi…
The Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) approach is a new and promising way to solve partial differential equations using deep learning. The $L^2$ Physics-Informed Loss is the de-facto standard in training Physics-Informed Neural Networks. In this paper, we challenge this common practice by investigating the relationship between the loss function and the approximation quality of the learned solution. In particular, we leverage the concept of stability in the literature of partial differential equation to study the asymptotic behavior of the learned solution as the loss approaches zero. With…
Do physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) need to be deep? Shallow PINNs using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm
organization= Department of Mathematics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember , city= Surabaya , postcode= 60111 , country= Indonesia；organization= Department of Mathematics, Khalifa University of Science \& Technology , city= Abu Dhabi , postcode= PO Box 127788 , country= United Arab Emirates；organization= Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics
University of Naples Federico II（那不勒斯费德里科二世大学）；SISSA – International School for Advanced Studies（国际高等研究学院（SISSA））；University of Colorado Boulder（科罗拉多大学博尔德分校）
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) are neural networks (NNs) that encode model equations, like Partial Differential Equations (PDE), as a component of the neural network itself. PINNs are nowadays used to solve PDEs, fractional equations, integral-differential equations, and stochastic PDEs. This novel methodology has arisen as a multi-task learning framework in which a NN must fit observed data while reducing a PDE residual. This article provides a comprehensive review of the literature on PINNs: while the primary goal of the study was to characterize these networks and their related adv…
While the popularity of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) is steadily rising, to this date PINNs have not been successful in simulating dynamical systems whose solution exhibits multi-scale, chaotic or turbulent behavior. In this work we attribute this shortcoming to the inability of existing PINNs formulations to respect the spatio-temporal causal structure that is inherent to the evolution of physical systems. We argue that this is a fundamental limitation and a key source of error that can ultimately steer PINN models to converge towards erroneous solutions. We address this pathology…
