arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2206.02016cs.LGcs.NAmath.NA

Is $L^2$ Physics-Informed Loss Always Suitable for Training Physics-Informed Neural Network?

Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学);Zhejiang Lab(之江实验室);Peking University(北京大学)

Chuwei Wang, Shanda Li, Di He, Liwei Wang

英文摘要:

The Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) approach is a new and promising way to solve partial differential equations using deep learning. The $L^2$ Physics-Informed Loss is the de-facto standard in training Physics-Informed Neural Networks. In this paper, we challenge this common practice by investigating the relationship between the loss function and the approximation quality of the learned solution. In particular, we leverage the concept of stability in the literature of partial differential equation to study the asymptotic behavior of the learned solution as the loss approaches zero. With this concept, we study an important class of high-dimensional non-linear PDEs in optimal control, the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman(HJB) Equation, and prove that for general $L^p$ Physics-Informed Loss, a wide class of HJB equation is stable only if $p$ is sufficiently large. Therefore, the commonly used $L^2$ loss is not suitable for training PINN on those equations, while $L^{\infty}$ loss is a better choice. Based on the theoretical insight, we develop a novel PINN training algorithm to minimize the $L^{\infty}$ loss for HJB equations which is in a similar spirit to adversarial training. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is empirically demonstrated through experiments. Our code is released at https://github.com/LithiumDA/L_inf-PINN.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑