arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
稍安勿躁,官方尚未更新
arXiv 2011.01774cs.AIcs.HC
收藏

Provenance-Based Assessment of Plans in Context

SIFT, LLC(SIFT有限责任公司)

Scott E. Friedman, Robert P. Goldman, Richard G. Freedman, Ugur Kuter, Christopher Geib, Jeffrey Rye

英文摘要:

Many real-world planning domains involve diverse information sources, external entities, and variable-reliability agents, all of which may impact the confidence, risk, and sensitivity of plans. Humans reviewing a plan may lack context about these factors; however, this information is available during the domain generation, which means it can also be interwoven into the planner and its resulting plans. This paper presents a provenance-based approach to explaining automated plans. Our approach (1) extends the SHOP3 HTN planner to generate dependency information, (2) transforms the dependency information into an established PROV-O representation, and (3) uses graph propagation and TMS-inspired algorithms to support dynamic and counter-factual assessment of information flow, confidence, and support. We qualified our approach's explanatory scope with respect to explanation targets from the automated planning literature and the information analysis literature, and we demonstrate its ability to assess a plan's pertinence, sensitivity, risk, assumption support, diversity, and relative confidence.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑