arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2011.00491cs.RO

MRPB 1.0: A Unified Benchmark for the Evaluation of Mobile Robot Local Planning Approaches

College of Artificial Intelligence, Nankai University(南开大学人工智能学院);Tianjin Key Laboratory of Intelligent Robotics, Nankai University(南开大学天津智能机器人重点实验室);School of Marine Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University(西北工业大学航海学院);Faculty of Robot Science and Engineering, Northeastern University(东北大学机器人科学与工程学院);College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology(国防科技大学系统工程学院)

Jian Wen, Xuebo Zhang, Qingchen Bi, Zhangchao Pan, Yanghe Feng, Jing Yuan, Yongchun Fang

英文摘要:

Local planning is one of the key technologies for mobile robots to achieve full autonomy and has been widely investigated. To evaluate mobile robot local planning approaches in a unified and comprehensive way, a mobile robot local planning benchmark called MRPB 1.0 is newly proposed in this paper. The benchmark facilitates both motion planning researchers who want to compare the performance of a new local planner relative to many other state-of-the-art approaches as well as end users in the mobile robotics industry who want to select a local planner that performs best on some problems of interest. We elaborately design various simulation scenarios to challenge the applicability of local planners, including large-scale, partially unknown, and dynamic complex environments. Furthermore, three types of principled evaluation metrics are carefully designed to quantitatively evaluate the performance of local planners, wherein the safety, efficiency, and smoothness of motions are comprehensively considered. We present the application of the proposed benchmark in two popular open-source local planners to show the practicality of the benchmark. In addition, some insights and guidelines about the design and selection of local planners are also provided. The benchmark website contains all data of the designed simulation scenarios, detailed descriptions of these scenarios, and example code.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑