arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2010.14741astro-ph.HE
收藏

活动星系核喷流中的$L_{\rm syn}-E_{\rm syn, p}-δ$关系和伽马射线暴的$L_{\rm p}-E_{\rm p,z}-Γ_0$关系的物理起源

$L_{\rm syn}-E_{\rm syn, p}-δ$ relation in Active Galactic Nucleus Jets and Implication for the physical origin of the $L_{\rm p}-E_{\rm p,z}-Γ_0$ relation of Gamma-Ray Bursts

Xiao-Li Huang, En-Wei Liang

摘要:

伽马射线暴和活动星系核的高能光子辐射主要是由它们的喷流辐射所决定的。本文研究了BL Lac、平谱射电类星体(FSRQs)和窄线Seyfert 1星系(NLS 1 s)中喷注的同步辐射是否遵循γ射线瞬发辐射与伽玛暴初始洛伦兹因子($Γ_0$)之间的关系。结果表明,活动星系核样品与伽玛暴的$L_{\rm p}-E_{\rm p,z}-Γ_{0}$不一致。此外,我们还得到了FSRQs和NLS 1星系的$L_{\rm syn}\propto E^{0.45\pm0.15}_{\rm syn,p}δ^{3.50\pm0.25}$的一个紧密关系,其中$L_{\rm syn}$是同步辐射的峰值光子能量$E_{\rm syn, p}$处的光度。这种关系不同于伽玛暴的$L_{\rm p}-E_{\rm p,z}-Γ_{0}$关系。对于FSRQs和NLS 1星系,$L_{\rm syn}$对$δ$的依赖性与多普勒增强效应的预期一致,但对于GBR则不然。我们认为$Γ_0$可能是辐射区域动能的代表,并且紧密的$L_{\rm p}-E_{\rm p, z}-Γ_0$关系是由辐射物理和喷流功率共同塑造的。

英文摘要:

High energy photon radiations of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are dominated by their jet radiations. We examine wether the synchrotron radiations of jets in BL Lacs, flat spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs), and Narrow Line Seyfert 1 galaxies (NLS1s) follow the relation between the prompt gamma-ray emission and the initial Lorentz factor ($Γ_0$) of GRBs. It is showed that the AGNs sample does not agree with the $L_{\rm p}-E_{\rm p,z}-Γ_{0}$ of GRBs. In addition, we obtain a tight relation of $L_{\rm syn}\propto E^{0.45\pm0.15}_{\rm syn,p}δ^{3.50\pm0.25}$ for FSRQs and NLS1 galaxies, where $L_{\rm syn}$ is the luminosity at peak photon energy $E_{\rm syn, p}$ of the synchrotron radiations. This relation is different from the $L_{\rm p}-E_{\rm p,z}-Γ_{0}$ relation of GRBs. The dependence of $L_{\rm syn}$ to $δ$ is consistent with the expectation of the Doppler boosting effect for the FSRQs and NLS1 galaxies, but it is not for GBRs. We argue that $Γ_0$ may be a representative of the kinetic power of the radiating region and the tight $L_{\rm p}-E_{\rm p, z}-Γ_0$ relation is shaped by the radiation physics and the jet power together.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑