arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2010.02494cs.CL

帮助!需要关于如何识别建议的建议

Help! Need Advice on Identifying Advice

Department of Linguistics, The University of Texas at Austin(德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校语言学系);Amazon Inc.(亚马逊公司);McGill University(麦吉尔大学)

Venkata Subrahmanyan Govindarajan, Benjamin T Chen, Rebecca Warholic, Katrin Erk, Junyi Jessy Li

AI总结:

本文提出一个包含两个Reddit论坛的英文数据集,用于识别帖子中是否包含建议,分析发现建议 discourse 中存在丰富的语言现象,初步模型显示预训练语言模型在识别建议方面优于基于规则的系统,但识别仍具挑战性。

摘要:

人类使用语言完成各种各样的任务-询问和提供建议是其中之一。在在线建议论坛中,建议与其他内容混合,如情感支持,有时明确陈述,有时隐含。理解建议的语言将使系统更好地掌握语言语用学;实际上,能够识别建议将大大提高在线寻求建议的效率,以及自然语言生成系统中的建议生成能力。我们提出一个来自两个Reddit建议论坛-r/AskParents和r/needadvice的英文数据集,标注了帖子中的句子是否包含建议。我们的分析揭示了建议 discourse 中丰富的语言现象。我们提出了初步模型,显示虽然预训练语言模型能够比基于规则的系统更好地捕捉建议,但建议识别仍具有挑战性,我们指出了未来研究的方向。评论:将呈现在EMNLP 2020上。

英文摘要:

Humans use language to accomplish a wide variety of tasks - asking for and giving advice being one of them. In online advice forums, advice is mixed in with non-advice, like emotional support, and is sometimes stated explicitly, sometimes implicitly. Understanding the language of advice would equip systems with a better grasp of language pragmatics; practically, the ability to identify advice would drastically increase the efficiency of advice-seeking online, as well as advice-giving in natural language generation systems. We present a dataset in English from two Reddit advice forums - r/AskParents and r/needadvice - annotated for whether sentences in posts contain advice or not. Our analysis reveals rich linguistic phenomena in advice discourse. We present preliminary models showing that while pre-trained language models are able to capture advice better than rule-based systems, advice identification is challenging, and we identify directions for future research. Comments: To be presented at EMNLP 2020.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑