arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2009.09435cs.LGcs.CLcs.CY

探索性别偏见缓解中的线性子空间假设

Exploring the Linear Subspace Hypothesis in Gender Bias Mitigation

University of Cambridge(剑桥大学);ETH Zürich(苏黎世联邦理工学院)

Francisco Vargas, Ryan Cotterell

AI总结:

本文推广Bolukbasi等人(2016)的线性性别偏见缓解方法至核化非线性版本,并实证验证了偏见子空间确为线性,支持原假设。

摘要:

Bolukbasi等人(2016)提出了最早针对词表示的女性别偏见缓解技术之一。他们的方法以预训练的词表示为输入,试图分离出一个能够捕获词表示中大部分性别偏见的线性子空间。根据类比评估任务的判断,他们的方法几乎消除了词表示中的性别偏见。然而,他们的方法隐含且未经检验的一个假设是,偏见子空间实际上是线性的。在这项工作中,我们将他们的方法推广到核化的非线性版本。我们从核主成分分析中汲取灵感,推导出一种非线性偏见隔离技术。我们讨论并克服了我们的方法在词表示非线性性别偏见缓解中的一些实际缺点,并实证分析了偏见子空间是否实际上是线性的。我们的分析表明,性别偏见实际上确实能被线性子空间很好地捕获,从而证明了Bolukbasi等人(2016)的假设是合理的。

英文摘要:

Bolukbasi et al. (2016) presents one of the first gender bias mitigation techniques for word representations. Their method takes pre-trained word representations as input and attempts to isolate a linear subspace that captures most of the gender bias in the representations. As judged by an analogical evaluation task, their method virtually eliminates gender bias in the representations. However, an implicit and untested assumption of their method is that the bias subspace is actually linear. In this work, we generalize their method to a kernelized, nonlinear version. We take inspiration from kernel principal component analysis and derive a nonlinear bias isolation technique. We discuss and overcome some of the practical drawbacks of our method for non-linear gender bias mitigation in word representations and analyze empirically whether the bias subspace is actually linear. Our analysis shows that gender bias is in fact well captured by a linear subspace, justifying the assumption of Bolukbasi et al. (2016).

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑