arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2009.09308cs.ROcs.AI

What is the Best Grid-Map for Self-Driving Cars Localization? An Evaluation under Diverse Types of Illumination, Traffic, and Environment

Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Espírito Santo (IFES)(圣埃斯皮里图联邦教育、科学和技术学院);Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)(圣埃斯皮里图联邦大学);Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)(里约热内卢联邦大学)

Filipe Mutz, Thiago Oliveira-Santos, Avelino Forechi, Karin S. Komati, Claudine Badue, Felipe M. G. França, Alberto F. De Souza

英文摘要:

The localization of self-driving cars is needed for several tasks such as keeping maps updated, tracking objects, and planning. Localization algorithms often take advantage of maps for estimating the car pose. Since maintaining and using several maps is computationally expensive, it is important to analyze which type of map is more adequate for each application. In this work, we provide data for such analysis by comparing the accuracy of a particle filter localization when using occupancy, reflectivity, color, or semantic grid maps. To the best of our knowledge, such evaluation is missing in the literature. For building semantic and colour grid maps, point clouds from a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor are fused with images captured by a front-facing camera. Semantic information is extracted from images with a deep neural network. Experiments are performed in varied environments, under diverse conditions of illumination and traffic. Results show that occupancy grid maps lead to more accurate localization, followed by reflectivity grid maps. In most scenarios, the localization with semantic grid maps kept the position tracking without catastrophic losses, but with errors from 2 to 3 times bigger than the previous. Colour grid maps led to inaccurate and unstable localization even using a robust metric, the entropy correlation coefficient, for comparing online data and the map.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑