When considering the accuracy of sensors in an automated vehicle (AV), it is not sufficient to evaluate the performance of any given sensor in isolation. Rather, the performance of any individual sensor must be considered in the context of the overall system design. Techniques like redundancy and different sensing modalities can reduce the chances of a sensing failure. Additionally, the use of safety models is essential to understanding whether any particular sensing failure is relevant. Only when the entire system design is taken into account can one properly understand the meaning of safety-relevant sensing failures in an AV. In this paper, we will consider what should actually constitute a sensing failure, how safety models play an important role in mitigating potential failures, how a system-level approach to safety will deliver a safe and scalable AV, and what an acceptable sensing failure rate should be considering the full picture of an AV's architecture.
A Safety Modulator Actor-Critic Method in Model-Free Safe Reinforcement Learning and Application in UAV Hovering
College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Sichuan University（四川大学电子信息工程学院）；City University of Hong Kong（香港城市大学）；Institute of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems, Lingchuan Industry（凌川工业无人机系统研究所）
The Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS) model offers provable safety for vehicle behaviors such as minimum safe following distance. However, handling worst-case variability and uncertainty may significantly lower vehicle permissiveness, and in some situations safety cannot be guaranteed. Digging deeper into Newtonian mechanics, we identify complications that result from considering vehicle status, road geometry and environmental parameters. An especially challenging situation occurs if these parameters change during the course of a collision avoidance maneuver such as hard braking. As part o…
University of California, Berkeley（加州大学伯克利分校）；Facebook AI Research（脸书人工智能研究院）
Multi-vehicle collision avoidance is a highly crucial problem due to the soaring interests of introducing autonomous vehicles into the real world in recent years. The safety of these vehicles while they complete their objectives is of paramount importance. Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability is a promising tool for guaranteeing safety for low-dimensional systems. However, due to its exponential complexity in computation time, no reachability-based methods have been able to guarantee safety for more than three vehicles successfully in unstructured scenarios. For systems with four or more vehicles…
Chalmers University of Technology（查尔姆斯理工大学）；University of Gothenburg（哥德堡大学）；RISE Research Institutes of Sweden（瑞典国家研究院）
The technology in the area of automated vehicles is gaining speed and promises many advantages. However, with the recent introduction of conditionally automated driving, we have also seen accidents. Test protocols for both, conditionally automated (e.g., on highways) and automated vehicles do not exist yet and leave researchers and practitioners with different challenges. For instance, current test procedures do not suffice for fully automated vehicles, which are supposed to be completely in charge for the driving task and have no driver as a back up. This paper presents current challenges of …
Autonomous vehicles face tremendous challenges while interacting with human drivers in different kinds of scenarios. Developing control methods with safety guarantees while performing interactions with uncertainty is an ongoing research goal. In this paper, we present a real-time safe control framework using bi-level optimization with Control Barrier Function (CBF) that enables an autonomous ego vehicle to interact with human-driven cars in ramp merging scenarios with a consistent safety guarantee. In order to explicitly address motion uncertainty, we propose a novel extension of control barri…
Human-robot collaboration including close physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) is a current trend in industry and also science. The safety guidelines prescribe two modes of safety: (i) power and force limitation and (ii) speed and separation monitoring. We examine the potential of robots equipped with artificial sensitive skin and a protective safety zone around it (peripersonal space) to safe pHRI.
Engineering Psychological Safety in Autonomous Vehicles: A Systems-Theoretic Framework for Psychological Safety in Autonomous Vehicles and its Validation in Real-World Scenarios
Capgemini Engineering（凯捷工程）；University of Oxford（牛津大学）；University of the West of England（西英格兰大学）
Understanding human driving behavior is crucial to develop autonomous vehicles' algorithms. However, most low level automation, such as the one in advanced driving assistance systems (ADAS), is based on objective safety measures, which are not always aligned with what the drivers perceive as safe and their correspondent driving behavior. Finding the bridge between the subjective perception and objective safety measures has been analyzed in this paper focusing specifically on lane-change scenarios. Results showed statistically significant differences between what is perceived as safe by drivers…
Behavior Trees in Functional Safety Supervisors for Autonomous Vehicles
Institut de Robòtica i Informàtica Industrial (CSIC-UPC)（机器人与工业信息研究所（西班牙国家研究委员会-加泰罗尼亚理工大学））；Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech（加泰罗尼亚理工大学（巴塞罗那科技学院））；Renault Group（雷诺集团）
本文提出一种基于行为树并符合 ISO 26262 的实时功能安全监督架构，用于在 SAE 3 级自动驾驶车辆中检测危险并确保安全合规。
Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Caltech（加州理工学院机械与土木工程系）；Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Caltech（加州理工学院计算与数学科学系）；Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University（塔夫茨大学机械工程系）
Robotic systems navigating in real-world settings require a semantic understanding of their environment to properly determine safe actions. This work aims to develop the mathematical underpinnings of such a representation -- specifically, the goal is to develop safety filters that are risk-aware. To this end, we take a two step approach: encoding an understanding of the environment via Poisson's equation, and associated risk via Laplace guidance fields. That is, we first solve a Dirichlet problem for Poisson's equation to generate a safety function that encodes system safety as its 0-superleve…
Vehicle-in-Virtual-Environment (VVE) Method for Developing and Evaluating VRU Safety of Connected and Autonomous Driving with Focus on Bicyclist Safety
Are automated vehicles really safer than manually driven vehicles? If so, how would we know? Answering this question has spurred a contentious debate. Unfortunately, several issues make answering this question difficult for the foreseeable future. First, how do we measure safety? Second, how can we keep track of automated vehicle (AV) safety? Finally, how do we determine what is or what is not an AV? Until these questions are addressed, it will continue to be difficult to determine whether or when AVs might really be safer than manually driven vehicles.
