arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2009.00749cs.CV

Iris Liveness Detection Competition (LivDet-Iris) -- The 2020 Edition

Clarkson University(克拉克森大学);University of Notre Dame(圣母大学);Idiap Research Institute(伊迪亚普研究所);Warsaw University of Technology(华沙理工大学);Medical University of Warsaw(华沙医科大学);Universidad de Santiago - Chile(智利圣地亚哥大学);Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research IGD(弗劳恩霍夫计算机图形研究所);Technical University of Darmstadt(达姆施塔特工业大学);TOC Biometrics - Chile(智利 TOC 生物识别公司);Michigan State University(密歇根州立大学)
Priyanka Das, Joseph McGrath, Zhaoyuan Fang, Aidan Boyd, Ganghee Jang, Amir Mohammadi, Sandip Purnapatra, David Yambay, Sébastien Marcel, Mateusz Trokielewicz, … 展开作者

Priyanka Das, Joseph McGrath, Zhaoyuan Fang, Aidan Boyd, Ganghee Jang, Amir Mohammadi, Sandip Purnapatra, David Yambay, Sébastien Marcel, Mateusz Trokielewicz, Piotr Maciejewicz, Kevin Bowyer, Adam Czajka, Stephanie Schuckers, Juan Tapia, Sebastian Gonzalez, Meiling Fang, Naser Damer, Fadi Boutros, Arjan Kuijper, Renu Sharma, Cunjian Chen, Arun Ross

英文摘要:

Launched in 2013, LivDet-Iris is an international competition series open to academia and industry with the aim to assess and report advances in iris Presentation Attack Detection (PAD). This paper presents results from the fourth competition of the series: LivDet-Iris 2020. This year's competition introduced several novel elements: (a) incorporated new types of attacks (samples displayed on a screen, cadaver eyes and prosthetic eyes), (b) initiated LivDet-Iris as an on-going effort, with a testing protocol available now to everyone via the Biometrics Evaluation and Testing (BEAT)(https://www.idiap.ch/software/beat/) open-source platform to facilitate reproducibility and benchmarking of new algorithms continuously, and (c) performance comparison of the submitted entries with three baseline methods (offered by the University of Notre Dame and Michigan State University), and three open-source iris PAD methods available in the public domain. The best performing entry to the competition reported a weighted average APCER of 59.10\% and a BPCER of 0.46\% over all five attack types. This paper serves as the latest evaluation of iris PAD on a large spectrum of presentation attack instruments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑