arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2007.14870cs.LGstat.ML
收藏

解码机器学习基准

Decoding machine learning benchmarks

Faculdade de Computação, Universidade Federal do Pará(帕拉联邦大学计算机学院);Centro de Informática, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco(伯南布哥联邦大学信息中心);Instituto Tecnológico Vale(淡水河谷技术研究所)

Lucas F. F. Cardoso, Vitor C. A. Santos, Regiane S. K. Francês, Ricardo B. C. Prudêncio, Ronnie C. O. Alves

摘要:

尽管基准机器学习(ML)存储库(例如,UCI,OpenML),目前还没有标准的评估策略能够指出哪一组数据集是测试不同ML算法的最佳黄金标准。在最近的研究中,项目反应理论(IRT)已经成为一种新的方法来阐明什么应该是一个好的ML基准。本文应用项目反应理论(IRT)对著名的OpenML-CC 18基准进行了探索,以确定它在分类器评估中的适用性。使用IRT模型评估了从经典分类器到集成分类器的几种分类器,该模型可以同时估计数据集难度和分类器的能力。在项目反应理论的基础上,采用Glicko-2评分系统,对分类者的内在能力和倾向性进行了总结。据观察,并非所有来自OpenML-CC 18的数据集都对评估分类器非常有用。在这项工作中评估的大多数数据集(84%)通常包含简单的实例(例如,只有10%的困难情况)。此外,在这个基准测试的一半中,80%的实例都是非常有区别的实例,这对于成对算法比较非常有用,但对于推动分类器的能力没有帮助。本文介绍了这种新的评价方法的基础上IRT以及工具decodIRT,开发来指导IRT估计ML基准。

英文摘要:

Despite the availability of benchmark machine learning (ML) repositories (e.g., UCI, OpenML), there is no standard evaluation strategy yet capable of pointing out which is the best set of datasets to serve as gold standard to test different ML algorithms. In recent studies, Item Response Theory (IRT) has emerged as a new approach to elucidate what should be a good ML benchmark. This work applied IRT to explore the well-known OpenML-CC18 benchmark to identify how suitable it is on the evaluation of classifiers. Several classifiers ranging from classical to ensembles ones were evaluated using IRT models, which could simultaneously estimate dataset difficulty and classifiers' ability. The Glicko-2 rating system was applied on the top of IRT to summarize the innate ability and aptitude of classifiers. It was observed that not all datasets from OpenML-CC18 are really useful to evaluate classifiers. Most datasets evaluated in this work (84%) contain easy instances in general (e.g., around 10% of difficult instances only). Also, 80% of the instances in half of this benchmark are very discriminating ones, which can be of great use for pairwise algorithm comparison, but not useful to push classifiers abilities. This paper presents this new evaluation methodology based on IRT as well as the tool decodIRT, developed to guide IRT estimation over ML benchmarks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑