arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2007.12498physics.comp-phphysics.plasm-ph
收藏

约束位形路径积分蒙特卡罗

Restricted configuration path integral Monte Carlo

A. Yilmaz, K. Hunger, T. Dornheim, S. Groth, M. Bonitz

摘要:

量子蒙特卡罗是量子多粒子系统最精确的模拟技术之一。然而,对于费米子,这些模拟受到符号问题的阻碍,该符号问题禁止在强简并状态下进行模拟。随着Schoof \textit{et al.} [T. Schoof \textit{et al.},Contrib. Plasma Phys. \textbf{51},687(2011)],其允许用于密集量子等离子体的第一个\textit{ab initio}模拟。CPIMC还具有当密度降低时发生的符号问题,即在与在坐标空间中制定的传统QMC互补的参数范围中。因此,CPIMC对温暖稠密电子气的模拟仅限于小的Brueckner参数值--粒子间距离与玻尔半径之比-- $r_s=\bar{r}/a_B \lesssim 1$。为了达到更强的耦合(低密度)与CPIMC的政权,在这里,我们调查的Monte Carlo程序的附加限制。特别是,我们介绍了两个不同版本的“限制CPIMC”,其中某些符号改变蒙特卡罗更新被省略。有趣的是,其中一种方法(RCPIMC)根本没有符号问题,但它不如RCPIMC+精确,后者只忽略了一小类Monte Carlo步骤。在这里,我们报告了广泛的模拟铁磁均匀电子气,我们调查的性质和精度的RCPIMC和RCPIMC+。此外,我们建立了密度-温度平面中的参数范围,这些模拟既可行又准确。结论是RCPIMC和RCPIMC+在$Θ\sim 0.1\dots 0.5$范围内的温度下工作最佳,允许达到高达$r_s \sim 3\dots 5$的密度参数,从而部分填补了现有\textit{ab initio} QMC方法留下的空白。

英文摘要:

Quantum Monte Carlo belongs to the most accurate simulation techniques for quantum many-particle systems. However, for fermions, these simulations are hampered by the sign problem that prohibits simulations in the regime of strong degeneracy. The situation changed with the development of configuration path integral Monte Carlo (CPIMC) by Schoof \textit{et al.} [T. Schoof \textit{et al.}, Contrib. Plasma Phys. \textbf{51}, 687 (2011)] that allowed for the first \textit{ab initio} simulations for dense quantum plasmas. CPIMC also has a sign problem that occurs when the density is lowered, i.e. in a parameter range that is complementary to traditional QMC formulated in coordinate space. Thus, CPIMC simulations for the warm dense electron gas are limited to small values of the Brueckner parameter -- the ratio of the interparticle distance to the Bohr radius -- $r_s=\bar{r}/a_B \lesssim 1$. In order to reach the regime of stronger coupling (lower density) with CPIMC, here we investigate additional restrictions on the Monte Carlo procedure. In particular, we introduce two different versions of "restricted CPIMC" where certain sign changing Monte Carlo updates are being omitted. Interestingly, one of the methods (RCPIMC) has no sign problem at all, but it is less accurate than RCPIMC+ which neglects only a smaller class of the Monte Carlo steps. Here we report extensive simulations for the ferromagnetic uniform electron gas with which we investigate the properties and accuracy of RCPIMC and RCPIMC+. Further, we establish the parameter range in the density-temperature plane where these simulations are both feasible and accurate. The conclusion is that RCPIMC and RCPIMC+ work best at temperatures in the range of $Θ\sim 0.1\dots 0.5$ allowing to reach density parameters up to $r_s \sim 3\dots 5$, thereby partially filling a gap left open by existing \textit{ab initio} QMC methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑