arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2007.10000cs.CV

On the Comparison of Classic and Deep Keypoint Detector and Descriptor Methods

University of Zagreb Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing(萨格勒布大学电气工程与计算学院);Yamagata University Faculty of Science(山形大学理学院);University of Girona Department of Computer Architecture and Technology(赫罗纳大学计算机体系结构与技术系)

Kristijan Bartol, David Bojanić, Tomislav Pribanić, Tomislav Petković, Yago Diez Donoso, Joaquim Salvi Mas

英文摘要:

The purpose of this study is to give a performance comparison between several classic hand-crafted and deep key-point detector and descriptor methods. In particular, we consider the following classical algorithms: SIFT, SURF, ORB, FAST, BRISK, MSER, HARRIS, KAZE, AKAZE, AGAST, GFTT, FREAK, BRIEF and RootSIFT, where a subset of all combinations is paired into detector-descriptor pipelines. Additionally, we analyze the performance of two recent and perspective deep detector-descriptor models, LF-Net and SuperPoint. Our benchmark relies on the HPSequences dataset that provides real and diverse images under various geometric and illumination changes. We analyze the performance on three evaluation tasks: keypoint verification, image matching and keypoint retrieval. The results show that certain classic and deep approaches are still comparable, with some classic detector-descriptor combinations overperforming pretrained deep models. In terms of the execution times of tested implementations, SuperPoint model is the fastest, followed by ORB. The source code is published on \url{https://github.com/kristijanbartol/keypoint-algorithms-benchmark}.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑