The malware analysis and detection research community relies on the online platform VirusTotal to label Android apps based on the scan results of around 60 antiviral scanners. Unfortunately, there are no standards on how to best interpret the scan results acquired from VirusTotal, which leads to the utilization of different threshold-based labeling strategies (e.g., if ten or more scanners deem an app malicious, it is considered malicious). While some of the utilized thresholds may be able to accurately approximate the ground truths of apps, the fact that VirusTotal changes the set and versions of the scanners it uses makes such thresholds unsustainable over time. We implemented a method, Maat, that tackles these issues of standardization and sustainability by automatically generating a Machine Learning (ML)-based labeling scheme, which outperforms threshold-based labeling strategies. Using the VirusTotal scan reports of 53K Android apps that span one year, we evaluated the applicability of Maat's ML-based labeling strategies by comparing their performance against threshold-based strategies. We found that such ML-based strategies (a) can accurately and consistently label apps based on their VirusTotal scan reports, and (b) contribute to training ML-based detection methods that are more effective at classifying out-of-sample apps than their threshold-based counterparts.
In training their newly-developed malware detection methods, researchers rely on threshold-based labeling strategies that interpret the scan reports provided by online platforms, such as VirusTotal. The dynamicity of this platform renders those labeling strategies unsustainable over prolonged periods, which leads to inaccurate labels. Using inaccurately labeled apps to train and evaluate malware detection methods significantly undermines the reliability of their results, leading to either dismissing otherwise promising detection approaches or adopting intrinsically inadequate ones. The infeasi…
VirusTotal (VT) provides aggregated threat intelligence on various entities including URLs, IP addresses, and binaries. It is widely used by researchers and practitioners to collect ground truth and evaluate the maliciousness of entities. In this work, we provide a comprehensive analysis of VT URL scanning reports containing the results of 95 scanners for 1.577 Billion URLs over two years. Individual VT scanners are known to be noisy in terms of their detection and attack type classification. To obtain high quality ground truth of URLs and actively take proper actions to mitigate different typ…
Online scanners analyze user-submitted files with a large number of security tools and provide access to the analysis results. As the most popular online scanner, VirusTotal (VT) is often used for determining if samples are malicious, labeling samples with their family, hunting for new threats, and collecting malware samples. We analyze 328M VT reports for 235M samples collected for one year through the VT file feed. We use the reports to characterize the VT file feed in depth and compare it with the telemetry of a large security vendor. We answer questions such as How diverse is the feed? Doe…
In evaluating detection methods, the malware research community relies on scan results obtained from online platforms such as VirusTotal. Nevertheless, given the lack of standards on how to interpret the obtained data to label apps, researchers hinge on their intuitions and adopt different labeling schemes. The dynamicity of VirusTotal's results along with adoption of different labeling schemes significantly affect the accuracies achieved by any given detection method even on the same dataset, which gives subjective views on the method's performance and hinders the comparison of different malw…
We present and evaluate a large-scale malware detection system integrating machine learning with expert reviewers, treating reviewers as a limited labeling resource. We demonstrate that even in small numbers, reviewers can vastly improve the system's ability to keep pace with evolving threats. We conduct our evaluation on a sample of VirusTotal submissions spanning 2.5 years and containing 1.1 million binaries with 778GB of raw feature data. Without reviewer assistance, we achieve 72% detection at a 0.5% false positive rate, performing comparable to the best vendors on VirusTotal. Given a budg…
MH-1M: A 1.34 Million-Sample Comprehensive Multi-Feature Android Malware Dataset for Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Large Language Models, and Threat Intelligence Research
Federal University of Amazonas（亚马逊联邦大学）；Institute of Computing（计算学院）；Federal University of Pampa（帕姆帕联邦大学）；AI Horizon Labs（AI地平线实验室）
Malware creators have been getting their way for too long now. String-based similarity measures can leverage ground truth in a scalable way and can operate at a level of abstraction that is difficult to combat from the code level. We introduce ITect, a scalable approach to malware similarity detection based on information theory. ITect targets file entropy patterns in different ways to achieve 100% precision with 90% accuracy but it could target 100% recall instead. It outperforms VirusTotal for precision and accuracy on combined Kaggle and VirusShare malware.
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev（本古里安大学）；Nanyang Technological University（南洋理工大学）
The performance of a machine learning-based malware classifier depends on the large and updated training set used to induce its model. In order to maintain an up-to-date training set, there is a need to continuously collect benign and malicious files from a wide range of sources, providing an exploitable target to attackers. In this study, we show how an attacker can launch a sophisticated and efficient poisoning attack targeting the dataset used to train a malware classifier. The attacker's ultimate goal is to ensure that the model induced by the poisoned dataset will be unable to detect the …
Malicious email attachments are a growing delivery vector for malware. While machine learning has been successfully applied to portable executable (PE) malware detection, we ask, can we extend similar approaches to detect malware across heterogeneous file types commonly found in email attachments? In this paper, we explore the feasibility of applying machine learning as a static countermeasure to detect several types of malicious email attachments including Microsoft Office documents and Zip archives. To this end, we collected a dataset of over 5 million malicious/benign Microsoft Office docum…
Federal University of Paraná（巴拉那联邦大学）；Victoria University of Wellington（惠灵顿维多利亚大学）
Malware is a major threat to computer systems and imposes many challenges to cyber security. Targeted threats, such as ransomware, cause millions of dollars in losses every year. The constant increase of malware infections has been motivating popular antiviruses (AVs) to develop dedicated detection strategies, which include meticulously crafted machine learning (ML) pipelines. However, malware developers unceasingly change their samples' features to bypass detection. This constant evolution of malware samples causes changes to the data distribution (i.e., concept drifts) that directly affect M…
Nanjing University of Science and Technology（南京理工大学）
Malware remains a big threat to cyber security, calling for machine learning based malware detection. While promising, such detectors are known to be vulnerable to evasion attacks. Ensemble learning typically facilitates countermeasures, while attackers can leverage this technique to improve attack effectiveness as well. This motivates us to investigate which kind of robustness the ensemble defense or effectiveness the ensemble attack can achieve, particularly when they combat with each other. We thus propose a new attack approach, named mixture of attacks, by rendering attackers capable of mu…
PAD: Towards Principled Adversarial Malware Detection Against Evasion Attacks
Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications（南京邮电大学）；Nanjing Institute of Technology（南京工程学院）；University of Colorado Colorado Springs（科罗拉多大学斯普林斯分校）
Malware attacks are costly. To mitigate against such attacks, organizations deploy malware detection tools that help them detect and eventually resolve those threats. While running only the best available tool does not provide enough coverage of the potential attacks, running all available tools is prohibitively expensive in terms of financial cost and computing resources. Therefore, an organization typically runs a set of tools that maximizes their coverage given a limited budget. However, how should an organization choose that set? Attackers are strategic, and will change their behavior to p…
This work focuses on a specific front of the malware detection arms-race, namely the detection of persistent, disk-resident malware. We exploit normalised compression distance (NCD), an information theoretic measure, applied directly to binaries. Given a zoo of labelled malware and benign-ware, we ask whether a suspect program is more similar to our malware or to our benign-ware. Our approach classifies malware with 97.1% accuracy and a false positive rate of 3%. We achieve our results with off-the-shelf compressors and a standard machine learning classifier and without any specialised knowled…
The variety of services and functionality offered by various cloud service providers (CSP) have exploded lately. Utilizing such services has created numerous opportunities for enterprises infrastructure to become cloud-based and, in turn, assisted the enterprises to easily and flexibly offer services to their customers. The practice of renting out access to servers to clients for computing and storage purposes is known as Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS). The popularity of IaaS has led to serious and critical concerns with respect to the cyber security and privacy. In particular, malware is …
The accurate measurement of security metrics is a critical research problem because an improper or inaccurate measurement process can ruin the usefulness of the metrics, no matter how well they are defined. This is a highly challenging problem particularly when the ground truth is unknown or noisy. In contrast to the well perceived importance of defining security metrics, the measurement of security metrics has been little understood in the literature. In this paper, we measure five malware detection metrics in the {\em absence} of ground truth, which is a realistic setting that imposes many t…
Malware Detection in Docker Containers: An Image is Worth a Thousand Logs
K3Y Ltd（K3Y有限公司）；International Hellenic University（国际希腊大学）；Kingston University（金斯顿大学）；University of Peloponnese（伯罗奔尼撒大学）；Aristotle University of Thessaloniki（亚里士多德大学）；Hellenic Mediterranean University（希腊地中海大学）；University of Western Macedonia（西马其顿大学）
