arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2006.15946eess.SPcs.LGq-bio.QM
收藏

GLYFE: Review and Benchmark of Personalized Glucose Predictive Models in Type-1 Diabetes

CNRS-LIMSI(法国国家科学研究中心-LIMSI);Université Paris-Saclay(巴黎萨克雷大学);Université Paris 8(巴黎第八大学);Samovar;CNRS(法国国家科学研究中心);Télécom SudParis(南巴黎电信学院);Institut Polytechnique de Paris(巴黎综合理工学院)

Maxime De Bois, Mehdi Ammi, Mounîm A. El Yacoubi

英文摘要:

Due to the sensitive nature of diabetes-related data, preventing them from being shared between studies, progress in the field of glucose prediction is hard to assess. To address this issue, we present GLYFE (GLYcemia Forecasting Evaluation), a benchmark of machine-learning-based glucose-predictive models. To ensure the reproducibility of the results and the usability of the benchmark in the future, we provide extensive details about the data flow. Two datasets are used, the first comprising 10 in-silico adults from the UVA/Padova Type 1 Diabetes Metabolic Simulator (T1DMS) and the second being made of 6 real type-1 diabetic patients coming from the OhioT1DM dataset. The predictive models are personalized to the patient and evaluated on 3 different prediction horizons (30, 60, and 120 minutes) with metrics assessing their accuracy and clinical acceptability. The results of nine different models coming from the glucose-prediction literature are presented. First, they show that standard autoregressive linear models are outclassed by kernel-based non-linear ones and neural networks. In particular, the support vector regression model stands out, being at the same time one of the most accurate and clinically acceptable model. Finally, the relative performances of the models are the same for both datasets. This shows that, even though data simulated by T1DMS are not fully representative of real-world data, they can be used to assess the forecasting ability of the glucose-predictive models. Those results serve as a basis of comparison for future studies. In a field where data are hard to obtain, and where the comparison of results from different studies is often irrelevant, GLYFE gives the opportunity of gathering researchers around a standardized common environment.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑