arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2005.14146astro-ph.HEgr-qc
收藏

测量GW170817和GW190425的偏心率

Measuring the eccentricity of GW170817 and GW190425

Amber K. Lenon, Alexander H. Nitz, Duncan A. Brown

摘要:

两颗中子星合并双星GW 170817和GW 190425已被Advanced LIGO和Virgo探测到。这些信号是通过匹配滤波器搜索检测到的,该搜索假设恒星的轨道在它们的引力波发射可观测时已经圆化。这表明它们的偏心率很低,但尚未对其偏心率进行完整的参数估计。我们利用引力波观测测量了GW 170817和GW 190425的偏心率。我们发现,在10 Hz的引力波频率的偏心率是$e \leq 0.024$和$e \leq 0.048$分别为GW 170817和GW 190425(90%的信心)。这与在现场形成的双星是一致的,因为这样的系统预计在到达LIGO-室女座带时已经循环到$e \leq 10^{-4}$。我们的约束是一个因素的两个更小的估计GW 170817被检测到的搜索,忽略偏心。然而,我们警告说,我们发现在我们的限制显着的先验依赖性,这表明有有限的信息在信号。我们注意到,用于约束二元中子星偏心率而不进行完整参数估计的其他技术可能会错过波形中的简并,并且对于未来的信号,使用准确的波形模板执行完整参数估计将是重要的。

英文摘要:

Two binary neutron star mergers, GW170817 and GW190425, have been detected by Advanced LIGO and Virgo. These signals were detected by matched-filter searches that assume the star's orbit has circularized by the time their gravitational-wave emission is observable. This suggests that their eccentricity is low, but full parameter estimation of their eccentricity has not yet been performed. We use gravitational-wave observations to measure the eccentricity of GW170817 and GW190425. We find that the eccentricity at a gravitational-wave frequency of 10 Hz is $e \leq 0.024$ and $e \leq 0.048$ for GW170817 and GW190425, respectively (90% confidence). This is consistent with the binaries being formed in the field, as such systems are expected to have circularized to $e \leq 10^{-4}$ by the time they reach the LIGO-Virgo band. Our constraint is a factor of two smaller that an estimate based on GW170817 being detected by searches that neglect eccentricity. However, we caution that we find significant prior dependence in our limits, suggesting that there is limited information in the signals. We note that other techniques used to constrain binary neutron star eccentricity without full parameter estimation may miss degeneracies in the waveform, and that for future signals it will be important to perform full parameter estimation with accurate waveform templates.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑