arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2005.13635cs.AIcs.CR

迈向人工智能取证:人工智能系统是否实施了该行为?

Towards AI Forensics: Did the Artificial Intelligence System Do It?

University of Liechtenstein(列支敦士登大学);University of Lausanne(洛桑大学)

Johannes Schneider, Frank Breitinger

AI总结:

本文针对AI系统可能造成事故或违规的取证难题,提出面向“设计上即恶意”AI的灰盒分析调查策略,并通过卷积神经网络实验揭示识别恶意AI的挑战与思路。

摘要:

人工智能(AI)正以日益自主的方式做出影响我们日常生活的决策。其行为可能导致事故、伤害,或更普遍地违反法规。判断某个AI是否导致了特定事件,以及如果是,是什么触发了该AI的行为,是关键的取证问题。我们提供了这些问题及取证调查策略的概念化框架。我们重点关注可能“设计上即恶意”的AI以及灰盒分析。我们使用卷积神经网络的评估展示了识别恶意AI的挑战与思路。

英文摘要:

Artificial intelligence (AI) makes decisions impacting our daily lives in an increasingly autonomous manner. Their actions might cause accidents, harm, or, more generally, violate regulations. Determining whether an AI caused a specific event and, if so, what triggered the AI's action, are key forensic questions. We provide a conceptualization of the problems and strategies for forensic investigation. We focus on AI that is potentially ``malicious by design'' and grey box analysis. Our evaluation using convolutional neural networks illustrates challenges and ideas for identifying malicious AI.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑