arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2005.13251physics.soc-phphysics.data-an
收藏

演化科学网络的结构动力学

Structure dynamics of evolving scientific networks

Demival Vasques Filho, Dion R. J. O'Neale

摘要:

合著网络在网络科学中得到了广泛的研究,因为它们是一个完美的例子,说明了系统的单个元素如何在复杂的、非平凡的交互结构上产生集体现象。然而,合著网络实际上是原始二分网络的单模式投影,我们在这里称之为科学网络,其中作者是连接到人工制品的代理人-他们发表的论文。然而,很少有研究考虑到原来的二分网络的结构,以理解和解释投影网络的拓扑性质。在这里,我们使用来自美国物理学会(APS)的广泛数据集创建二分网络,这些数据集可以追溯到1893年至2015年(含),以及来自arXiv(1986-2015)。我们着眼于出版物的时间演变和科学网络的动态结构,考虑到二分网络的四个主要特征,即度分布,密度,冗余和周期。我们展示了这些特征如何塑造合著网络的形成及其观察到的结构特性。虽然大多数学科的网络结构并没有随着时间的推移而发生显着变化,但在物理学中,大型合作的出现在很大程度上产生了顶部节点的倾斜度分布。后者,反过来,诱导大量的集团在投影,引发相当大的致密化的合著网络,而原来的二分网络的密度保持在相同的水平。

英文摘要:

Co-authorship networks have been extensively studied in network science as they pose as a perfect example of how single elements of a system give rise to collective phenomena on an intricate, non-trivial structure of interactions. However, co-authorship networks are, in fact, one-mode projections of original bipartite networks, which we call here scientific networks, where authors are agents connected to artifacts - the papers they have published. Nonetheless, few studies take into account the structure of the original bipartite network to understand and explain the topological properties of the projected network. Here, we create bipartite networks using extensive datasets from the American Physical Society (APS) dating back to 1893 up to 2015 inclusive, and from arXiv (1986-2015). We look at the time evolution of publications and at the dynamic structure of scientific networks considering four major features of bipartite networks, namely degree distributions, density, redundancy and cycles. We show how such features shape the formation of co-authorship networks and their observed structural properties. While the structure of the networks of most disciplines does not show significant changes over time, the appearance of large collaborations, in physics, generate largely skewed degree distributions of top nodes. The latter, in turn, induces massive cliques in the projection, triggering considerable densification of the co-authorship network, while the density of the original bipartite network remains at the same levels.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑