比较大学组织单位和科学合著社区
Comparing university organizational units and scientific co-authorship communities
摘要：
大学里的科学家合著网络是复杂进化网络的典型例子。合作研发网络是科学家之间合作伙伴选择的自组织产物。现代科学由于迫切需要新颖性而具有很强的跨学科性。每天都可以观察到不同科学学科和组织单位之间的交叉。由于协作研究已成为产生高质量产出的主导和最有前途的方式，协作结构也是研究和管理设计的目标。我们研究共同作者的引文索引覆盖都柏林大学学院，一个大型的爱尔兰大学。我们特别关注组织单位之间的合作，如学校或学院。我们比较了经纪人在其组织单位中的中心地位。用标准网络测度分析了合著网络，观察到了复杂网络的典型特征。我们使用作者和论文的二分网络来识别合作者社区和论文集群。观察到的社区相比，正式的组织单位的大学。
英文摘要：
A co-authorship network of scientists at a university is an archetypical example of a complex evolving network. Collaborative R&D networks are self-organized products of partner choice between scientists. Modern science is, due to the immanent imperative of newness, strongly interdisciplinary. Crossovers between the different scientific disciplines and organizational units are observable on a daily basis. Since collaborative research has become the dominant and most promising way to produce high-quality output, collaboration structures are also a target for research and management design. We study co-authorship covered by the Citation Index within University College Dublin, a large Irish university. We focus especially on collaborations between organizational units, such as schools or colleges. We compare the centrality of the brokerage individuals within their organizational units. The network of co-authorship is analyzed with standard network measures, with typical features for complex networks observed. We use the bipartite network of authors and papers for the identification of communities of collaborators and clusters of papers. The observed communities are compared to the formal organizational units of the university.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
