arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2005.07161quant-ph
收藏

广义非语境本体论模型的结构定理

A structure theorem for generalized-noncontextual ontological models

David Schmid, John H. Selby, Matthew F. Pusey, Robert W. Spekkens

AI总结:

本文将广义非语境本体论模型推广至任意组合场景,证明层析局域操作理论的这类模型对应非过完备框架表示,最大本体态数由广义概率理论维度决定,并建立三种经典可解释性概念的等价性。

摘要:

判断一种操作理论的预测何时可被经典解释的判据是十分有用的。本文采用的判据是该理论容许一个广义非语境本体论模型。现有的广义非语境性研究主要聚焦于结构简单的实验场景:典型为制备-测量场景。本文将本体论模型框架以及广义非语境性原理形式化地推广到任意组合场景。我们利用过程理论框架证明,在一些合理假设下,层析局域操作理论的每一个广义非语境本体论模型都具有出人意料的严格且简单的数学结构——简而言之,它对应于一种非过完备的框架表示。该定理的一个推论是,任何此类模型中可能存在的最大本体态数目由相关广义概率理论的维度给出。这一约束对于生成非语境性不可行定理,以及实验验证语境性的技术都十分有用。在此过程中,我们将关于不同经典性概念等价性的已知结果从制备-测量场景推广到任意组合场景。具体而言,我们证明了操作理论的以下三种经典可解释性概念之间的对应关系:(i)存在针对该理论的非语境本体论模型;(ii)其定义的广义概率理论存在正准概率表示;(iii)其定义的广义概率理论存在本体论模型。

英文摘要:

It is useful to have a criterion for when the predictions of an operational theory should be considered classically explainable. Here we take the criterion to be that the theory admits of a generalized-noncontextual ontological model. Existing works on generalized noncontextuality have focused on experimental scenarios having a simple structure: typically, prepare-measure scenarios. Here, we formally extend the framework of ontological models as well as the principle of generalized noncontextuality to arbitrary compositional scenarios. We leverage a process-theoretic framework to prove that, under some reasonable assumptions, every generalized-noncontextual ontological model of a tomographically local operational theory has a surprisingly rigid and simple mathematical structure -- in short, it corresponds to a frame representation which is not overcomplete. One consequence of this theorem is that the largest number of ontic states possible in any such model is given by the dimension of the associated generalized probabilistic theory. This constraint is useful for generating noncontextuality no-go theorems as well as techniques for experimentally certifying contextuality. Along the way, we extend known results concerning the equivalence of different notions of classicality from prepare-measure scenarios to arbitrary compositional scenarios. Specifically, we prove a correspondence between the following three notions of classical explainability of an operational theory: (i) existence of a noncontextual ontological model for it, (ii) existence of a positive quasiprobability representation for the generalized probabilistic theory it defines, and (iii) existence of an ontological model for the generalized probabilistic theory it defines.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑