arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.11997cs.CL

New Protocols and Negative Results for Textual Entailment Data Collection

New York University(纽约大学);Google Research(谷歌研究院)

Samuel R. Bowman, Jennimaria Palomaki, Livio Baldini Soares, Emily Pitler

英文摘要:

Natural language inference (NLI) data has proven useful in benchmarking and, especially, as pretraining data for tasks requiring language understanding. However, the crowdsourcing protocol that was used to collect this data has known issues and was not explicitly optimized for either of these purposes, so it is likely far from ideal. We propose four alternative protocols, each aimed at improving either the ease with which annotators can produce sound training examples or the quality and diversity of those examples. Using these alternatives and a fifth baseline protocol, we collect and compare five new 8.5k-example training sets. In evaluations focused on transfer learning applications, our results are solidly negative, with models trained on our baseline dataset yielding good transfer performance to downstream tasks, but none of our four new methods (nor the recent ANLI) showing any improvements over that baseline. In a small silver lining, we observe that all four new protocols, especially those where annotators edit pre-filled text boxes, reduce previously observed issues with annotation artifacts.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑