arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.11779cs.CL

Exploring Explainable Selection to Control Abstractive Summarization

Institute for Language, Cognition and Computation, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh(爱丁堡大学信息学院语言、认知与计算研究所)

Wang Haonan, Gao Yang, Bai Yu, Mirella Lapata, Huang Heyan

英文摘要:

Like humans, document summarization models can interpret a document's contents in a number of ways. Unfortunately, the neural models of today are largely black boxes that provide little explanation of how or why they generated a summary in the way they did. Therefore, to begin prying open the black box and to inject a level of control into the substance of the final summary, we developed a novel select-and-generate framework that focuses on explainability. By revealing the latent centrality and interactions between sentences, along with scores for sentence novelty and relevance, users are given a window into the choices a model is making and an opportunity to guide those choices in a more desirable direction. A novel pair-wise matrix captures the sentence interactions, centrality, and attribute scores, and a mask with tunable attribute thresholds allows the user to control which sentences are likely to be included in the extraction. A sentence-deployed attention mechanism in the abstractor ensures the final summary emphasizes the desired content. Additionally, the encoder is adaptable, supporting both Transformer- and BERT-based configurations. In a series of experiments assessed with ROUGE metrics and two human evaluations, ESCA outperformed eight state-of-the-art models on the CNN/DailyMail and NYT50 benchmark datasets.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑