arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.09406cs.CVcs.AIcs.LGq-bio.NCstat.ML
收藏

Five Points to Check when Comparing Visual Perception in Humans and Machines

University of Tübingen(图宾根大学);Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience(伯恩斯坦计算神经科学中心);Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience(维尔纳·赖夏特整合神经科学中心);Volkswagen Group Machine Learning Research Lab(大众集团机器学习研究实验室)

Christina M. Funke, Judy Borowski, Karolina Stosio, Wieland Brendel, Thomas S. A. Wallis, Matthias Bethge

英文摘要:

With the rise of machines to human-level performance in complex recognition tasks, a growing amount of work is directed towards comparing information processing in humans and machines. These studies are an exciting chance to learn about one system by studying the other. Here, we propose ideas on how to design, conduct and interpret experiments such that they adequately support the investigation of mechanisms when comparing human and machine perception. We demonstrate and apply these ideas through three case studies. The first case study shows how human bias can affect how we interpret results, and that several analytic tools can help to overcome this human reference point. In the second case study, we highlight the difference between necessary and sufficient mechanisms in visual reasoning tasks. Thereby, we show that contrary to previous suggestions, feedback mechanisms might not be necessary for the tasks in question. The third case study highlights the importance of aligning experimental conditions. We find that a previously-observed difference in object recognition does not hold when adapting the experiment to make conditions more equitable between humans and machines. In presenting a checklist for comparative studies of visual reasoning in humans and machines, we hope to highlight how to overcome potential pitfalls in design or inference.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑