学术网站持久标识符的持久性研究
On the Persistence of Persistent Identifiers of the Scholarly Web
摘要：
学术资源，就像网络上的任何其他资源一样，会受到引用腐烂的影响，因为它们经常消失或随着时间的推移而发生重大变化。数字对象标识符（DOI）是持久地标识学术资源的常见方法，并已成为引用它们的事实标准。我们调查的概念，持久性的DOI通过分析其决议在网络上。我们对这些标识符的持久性的信心部分来自于这样一个假设，即无论我们使用哪种HTTP请求方法或从哪个网络环境发送请求，解引用DOI都会始终返回相同的响应。然而，我们的实验表明，根据我们的解释，持久性是不必要的。我们发现，学术内容提供方不同的响应不同的请求方法和网络环境，甚至改变他们的响应请求对同一个DOI。在本文中，我们提出了我们的定量分析的结果，旨在告知学术交流社区这种令人不安的缺乏一致性。
英文摘要：
Scholarly resources, just like any other resources on the web, are subject to reference rot as they frequently disappear or significantly change over time. Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) are commonplace to persistently identify scholarly resources and have become the de facto standard for citing them. We investigate the notion of persistence of DOIs by analyzing their resolution on the web. We derive confidence in the persistence of these identifiers in part from the assumption that dereferencing a DOI will consistently return the same response, regardless of which HTTP request method we use or from which network environment we send the requests. Our experiments show, however, that persistence, according to our interpretation, is not warranted. We find that scholarly content providers respond differently to varying request methods and network environments and even change their response to requests against the same DOI. In this paper we present the results of our quantitative analysis that is aimed at informing the scholarly communication community about this disconcerting lack of consistency.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
