arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2004.01694cs.CLcs.AI

A Set of Recommendations for Assessing Human-Machine Parity in Language Translation

University of Zurich(苏黎世大学);ADAPT Centre, Dublin City University(都柏林城市大学ADAPT中心);Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学);University of Groningen(格罗宁根大学)

Samuel Läubli, Sheila Castilho, Graham Neubig, Rico Sennrich, Qinlan Shen, Antonio Toral

英文摘要:

The quality of machine translation has increased remarkably over the past years, to the degree that it was found to be indistinguishable from professional human translation in a number of empirical investigations. We reassess Hassan et al.'s 2018 investigation into Chinese to English news translation, showing that the finding of human-machine parity was owed to weaknesses in the evaluation design - which is currently considered best practice in the field. We show that the professional human translations contained significantly fewer errors, and that perceived quality in human evaluation depends on the choice of raters, the availability of linguistic context, and the creation of reference translations. Our results call for revisiting current best practices to assess strong machine translation systems in general and human-machine parity in particular, for which we offer a set of recommendations based on our empirical findings.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑