玻尔与爱因斯坦之争中的一次不被重视的交锋
An Underappreciated Exchange in the Bohr--Einstein Debate
摘要：
玻尔-爱因斯坦之争是物理学物理学史上最引人注目的旷日持久的思想交流之一。它的影响一直持续着：在2013年一项关于量子基础的调查中，为数不多的明确模式之一是，那些相信玻尔是正确的物理学家往往会说爱因斯坦错了。这种交流始于玻尔和爱因斯坦1920年第一次见面，在接下来的十年里继续在索尔维会议上进行，在1935年以EPR悖论达到戏剧性的高潮，并在此后继续下去。在这个漫长的故事中，并不是每一个情节都得到了同样的调查。特别是，玻尔后来的一个陈述比爱因斯坦同样精辟的回答受到了更严格的审查。
英文摘要：
The Bohr--Einstein debate is one of the more remarkable protracted intellectual exchanges in the history of physics. Its influence has been lasting: One of the few clear patterns in a 2013 survey about quantum foundations was that the physicists who believed Bohr to be correct were apt to say that Einstein had been wrong. The exchanges began when Bohr and Einstein first met in 1920, continued at the Solvay conferences of the following decade, reached a dramatic crescendo with the EPR paradox in 1935, and continued thereafter. Not every episode in this long story has been investigated equally. In particular, one late statement attributed to Bohr has received much more intense examination than Einstein's equally pithy reply.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
