arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.12056cs.CVcs.LG
收藏

标签对于神经结构搜索是必要的吗?

Are Labels Necessary for Neural Architecture Search?

Johns Hopkins University(约翰霍普金斯大学);Facebook AI Research(Facebook人工智能研究院)

Chenxi Liu, Piotr Dollár, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, Alan Yuille, Saining Xie

摘要:

计算机视觉中现有的神经网络架构-无论是由人类还是机器设计-通常都使用图像及其相关标签。在本文中,我们提出了一个问题:我们能否仅使用图像而不使用人工标注的标签来找到高质量的神经架构?为了回答这个问题,我们首先定义了一个新的设置,称为无监督神经架构搜索(UnNAS)。然后,我们进行了两组实验。在基于样本的实验中,我们训练了大量(500)不同的架构,无论是监督或无监督的目标,并发现与标签和无标签的架构排名是高度相关的。在基于搜索的实验中,我们使用各种无监督目标运行一个成熟的NAS算法(DARTS),并报告说,没有标签搜索的架构可以与使用标签搜索的架构竞争。总之,这些结果揭示了一个潜在的令人惊讶的发现,即标签是不必要的,仅凭图像统计数据就足以识别良好的神经结构。

英文摘要:

Existing neural network architectures in computer vision -- whether designed by humans or by machines -- were typically found using both images and their associated labels. In this paper, we ask the question: can we find high-quality neural architectures using only images, but no human-annotated labels? To answer this question, we first define a new setup called Unsupervised Neural Architecture Search (UnNAS). We then conduct two sets of experiments. In sample-based experiments, we train a large number (500) of diverse architectures with either supervised or unsupervised objectives, and find that the architecture rankings produced with and without labels are highly correlated. In search-based experiments, we run a well-established NAS algorithm (DARTS) using various unsupervised objectives, and report that the architectures searched without labels can be competitive to their counterparts searched with labels. Together, these results reveal the potentially surprising finding that labels are not necessary, and the image statistics alone may be sufficient to identify good neural architectures.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑