arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.11446cs.CR
收藏

用于隐私保护数据聚合的概率计数器

Probabilistic Counters for Privacy Preserving Data Aggregation

Wrocław University of Science and Technology(弗罗茨瓦夫科技大学)

Dominik Bojko, Krzysztof Grining, Marek Klonowski

AI总结:

本文提出基于Morris和MaxGeo计数器的隐私保护数据聚合协议,通过概率计数器实现隐私保护,无需额外随机化。

摘要:

概率计数器是广为人知的工具,常用于空间高效集合基数估计。在本文中,我们从隐私保护的角度研究概率计数器。我们使用标准的、刚性的差分隐私概念。其直觉是概率计数器不会揭示太多关于个体的信息,但只提供关于总体的一般信息。因此,它们可以在不违反个人隐私的情况下安全使用。然而,发现提供概率计数器隐私参数的精确、正式分析出人意料地困难,需要高级技术和非常谨慎的方法。我们证明概率计数器可以作为隐私保护机制,而无需额外的随机化。即,协议中固有的随机化足以保护隐私,即使概率计数器被多次使用。特别是,我们提出了一种基于Morris计数器和MaxGeo计数器的隐私保护数据聚合协议。一些呈现的结果是针对迄今为止从隐私保护角度未被研究的计数器。另一部分是对先前结果的改进。我们展示了如何利用我们的结果来进行分布式调查,并比较计数器解决方案和标准拉普拉斯方法的性质。

英文摘要:

Probabilistic counters are well-known tools often used for space-efficient set cardinality estimation. In this paper, we investigate probabilistic counters from the perspective of preserving privacy. We use the standard, rigid differential privacy notion. The intuition is that the probabilistic counters do not reveal too much information about individuals but provide only general information about the population. Therefore, they can be used safely without violating the privacy of individuals. However, it turned out, that providing a precise, formal analysis of the privacy parameters of probabilistic counters is surprisingly difficult and needs advanced techniques and a very careful approach. We demonstrate that probabilistic counters can be used as a privacy protection mechanism without extra randomization. Namely, the inherent randomization from the protocol is sufficient for protecting privacy, even if the probabilistic counter is used multiple times. In particular, we present a specific privacy-preserving data aggregation protocol based on Morris Counter and MaxGeo Counter. Some of the presented results are devoted to counters that have not been investigated so far from the perspective of privacy protection. Another part is an improvement of previous results. We show how our results can be used to perform distributed surveys and compare the properties of counter-based solutions and a standard Laplace method.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑