Aggregation and Transformation of Vector-Valued Messages in the Shuffle Model of Differential Privacy
Mary Scott, Graham Cormode, Carsten Maple
备注：
16 pages, 5 figures, in: IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (TIFS), 2022. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2112.05464
Advances in communications, storage and computational technology allow significant quantities of data to be collected and processed by distributed devices. Combining the information from these endpoints can realize significant societal benefit but presents challenges in protecting the privacy of individuals, especially important in an increasingly regulated world. Differential privacy (DP) is a technique that provides a rigorous and provable privacy guarantee for aggregation and release. The Shuffle Model for DP has been introduced to overcome challenges regarding the accuracy of local-DP algorithms and the privacy risks of central-DP. In this work we introduce a new protocol for vector aggregation in the context of the Shuffle Model. The aim of this paper is twofold; first, we provide a single message protocol for the summation of real vectors in the Shuffle Model, using advanced composition results. Secondly, we provide an improvement on the bound on the error achieved through using this protocol through the implementation of a Discrete Fourier Transform, thereby minimizing the initial error at the expense of the loss in accuracy through the transformation itself. This work will further the exploration of more sophisticated structures such as matrices and higher-dimensional tensors in this context, both of which are reliant on the functionality of the vector case.
The shuffle model of differential privacy (Erlingsson et al. SODA 2019; Cheu et al. EUROCRYPT 2019) and its close relative encode-shuffle-analyze (Bittau et al. SOSP 2017) provide a fertile middle ground between the well-known local and central models. Similarly to the local model, the shuffle model assumes an untrusted data collector who receives privatized messages from users, but in this case a secure shuffler is used to transmit messages from users to the collector in a way that hides which messages came from which user. An interesting feature of the shuffle model is that increasing the am…
In this work we introduce a new protocol for vector aggregation in the context of the Shuffle Model, a recent model within Differential Privacy (DP). It sits between the Centralized Model, which prioritizes the level of accuracy over the secrecy of the data, and the Local Model, for which an improvement in trust is counteracted by a much higher noise requirement. The Shuffle Model was developed to provide a good balance between these two models through the addition of a shuffling step, which unbinds the users from their data whilst maintaining a moderate noise requirement. We provide a single …
We present a protocol in the shuffle model of differential privacy (DP) for the \textit{frequency estimation} problem that achieves error $ω(1)\cdot O(\log n)$, almost matching the central-DP accuracy, with $1+o(1)$ messages per user. This exhibits a sharp transition phenomenon, as there is a lower bound of $Ω(n^{1/4})$ if each user is allowed to send only one message. Previously, such a result is only known when the domain size $B$ is $o(n)$. For a large domain, we also need an efficient method to identify the \textit{heavy hitters} (i.e., elements that are frequent enough). For this purpose,…
Robust Single-message Shuffle Differential Privacy Protocol for Accurate Distribution Estimation
Xidian University（西安电子科技大学）；China Mobile (Suzhou) Software Technology Co., Ltd.（中国移动（苏州）软件技术有限公司）；Guangzhou University（广州大学）；Shanghai University（上海大学）；The Hong Kong Polytechnic University（香港理工大学）
The shuffle model of differential privacy has attracted attention in the literature due to it being a middle ground between the well-studied central and local models. In this work, we study the problem of summing (aggregating) real numbers or integers, a basic primitive in numerous machine learning tasks, in the shuffle model. We give a protocol achieving error arbitrarily close to that of the (Discrete) Laplace mechanism in the central model, while each user only sends $1 + o(1)$ short messages in expectation.
The *shuffle model* is a powerful tool to amplify the privacy guarantees of the *local model* of differential privacy. In contrast to the fully decentralized manner of guaranteeing privacy in the local model, the shuffle model requires a central, trusted shuffler. To avoid this central shuffler, recent work of Liew et al. (2022) proposes shuffling locally randomized data in a decentralized manner, via random walks on the communication network constituted by the clients. The privacy amplification bound it thus provides depends on the topology of the underlying communication network, even for in…
We study differentially private distributed optimization under communication constraints. A server using SGD for optimization aggregates the client-side local gradients for model updates using distributed mean estimation (DME). We develop a communication-efficient private DME, using the recently developed multi-message shuffled (MMS) privacy framework. We analyze our proposed DME scheme to show that it achieves the order-optimal privacy-communication-performance tradeoff resolving an open question in [1], whether the shuffled models can improve the tradeoff obtained in Secure Aggregation. This…
Recent work in differential privacy has highlighted the shuffled model as a promising avenue to compute accurate statistics while keeping raw data in users' hands. We present a protocol in this model that estimates histograms with error independent of the domain size. This implies an arbitrarily large gap in sample complexity between the shuffled and local models. On the other hand, the models are equivalent when we impose the constraints of pure differential privacy and single-message randomizers.
The shuffle model is recently proposed to address the issue of severe utility loss in Local Differential Privacy (LDP) due to distributed data randomization.In the shuffle model, a shuffler is utilized to break the link between the user identity and the message uploaded to the data analyst. Since less noise needs to be introduced to achieve the same privacy guarantee, following this paradigm, the utility of privacy-preserving data collection is improved. We propose DUMP (\underline{DUM}my-\underline{P}oint-based), a framework for privacy-preserving histogram estimation in the shuffle model. Th…
There has been much recent work in the shuffle model of differential privacy, particularly for approximate $d$-bin histograms. While these protocols achieve low error, the number of messages sent by each user -- the message complexity -- has so far scaled with $d$ or the privacy parameters. The message complexity is an informative predictor of a shuffle protocol's resource consumption. We present a protocol whose message complexity is two when there are sufficiently many users. The protocol essentially pairs each row in the dataset with a fake row and performs a simple randomization on all row…
In shuffle privacy, each user sends a collection of randomized messages to a trusted shuffler, the shuffler randomly permutes these messages, and the resulting shuffled collection of messages must satisfy differential privacy. Prior work in this model has largely focused on protocols that use a single round of communication to compute algorithmic primitives like means, histograms, and counts. We present interactive shuffle protocols for stochastic convex optimization. Our protocols rely on a new noninteractive protocol for summing vectors of bounded $\ell_2$ norm. By combining this sum subrout…
Google Research（谷歌研究院）；MIT（麻省理工学院）；IT University of Copenhagen（哥本哈根信息技术大学）
An exciting new development in differential privacy is the shuffled model, in which an anonymous channel enables non-interactive, differentially private protocols with error much smaller than what is possible in the local model, while relying on weaker trust assumptions than in the central model. In this paper, we study basic counting problems in the shuffled model and establish separations between the error that can be achieved in the single-message shuffled model and in the shuffled model with multiple messages per user. For the problem of frequency estimation for $n$ users and a domain of s…
Harvard University（哈佛大学）；Northeastern University（东北大学）；Google New York（谷歌纽约）；University of Pennsylvania（宾夕法尼亚大学）
In the \emph{shuffle model} of differential privacy, data-holding users send randomized messages to a secure shuffler, the shuffler permutes the messages, and the resulting collection of messages must be differentially private with regard to user data. In the \emph{pan-private} model, an algorithm processes a stream of data while maintaining an internal state that is differentially private with regard to the stream data. We give evidence connecting these two apparently different models. Our results focus on \emph{robustly} shuffle private protocols, whose privacy guarantees are not greatly aff…
Google Research（谷歌研究院）；IT University of Copenhagen（哥本哈根信息技术大学）
Federated learning promises to make machine learning feasible on distributed, private datasets by implementing gradient descent using secure aggregation methods. The idea is to compute a global weight update without revealing the contributions of individual users. Current practical protocols for secure aggregation work in an "honest but curious" setting where a curious adversary observing all communication to and from the server cannot learn any private information assuming the server is honest and follows the protocol. A more scalable and robust primitive for privacy-preserving protocols is s…
Google Research（谷歌研究院）；Tel Aviv University（特拉维夫大学）
We introduce the concurrent shuffle model of differential privacy. In this model we have multiple concurrent shufflers permuting messages from different, possibly overlapping, batches of users. Similarly to the standard (single) shuffle model, the privacy requirement is that the concatenation of all shuffled messages should be differentially private. We study the private continual summation problem (a.k.a. the counter problem) and show that the concurrent shuffle model allows for significantly improved error compared to a standard (single) shuffle model. Specifically, we give a summation algor…
The shuffled (aka anonymous) model has recently generated significant interest as a candidate distributed privacy framework with trust assumptions better than the central model but with achievable errors smaller than the local model. We study pure differentially private (DP) protocols in the shuffled model for summation, a basic and widely used primitive: - For binary summation where each of n users holds a bit as an input, we give a pure $ε$-DP protocol for estimating the number of ones held by the users up to an error of $O_ε(1)$, and each user sends $O_ε(\log n)$ messages each of 1 bit. Thi…
The shuffle model of differential privacy was proposed as a viable model for performing distributed differentially private computations. Informally, the model consists of an untrusted analyzer that receives messages sent by participating parties via a shuffle functionality, the latter potentially disassociates messages from their senders. Prior work focused on one-round differentially private shuffle model protocols, demonstrating that functionalities such as addition and histograms can be performed in this model with accuracy levels similar to that of the curator model of differential privacy…
In recent work, Cheu et al. (Eurocrypt 2019) proposed a protocol for $n$-party real summation in the shuffle model of differential privacy with $O_{ε, δ}(1)$ error and $Θ(ε\sqrt{n})$ one-bit messages per party. In contrast, every local model protocol for real summation must incur error $Ω(1/\sqrt{n})$, and there exist protocols matching this lower bound which require just one bit of communication per party. Whether this gap in number of messages is necessary was left open by Cheu et al. In this note we show a protocol with $O(1/ε)$ error and $O(\log(n/δ))$ messages of size $O(\log(n))$ per par…
Ranking aggregation is commonly adopted in cooperative decision-making to assist in combining multiple rankings into a single representative. To protect the actual ranking of each individual, some privacy-preserving strategies, such as differential privacy, are often used. This, however, does not consider the scenario where the curator, who collects all rankings from individuals, is untrustworthy. This paper proposed a mechanism to solve the above situation using the distribute differential privacy framework. The proposed mechanism collects locally differential private rankings from individual…
There has been a recent wave of interest in intermediate trust models for differential privacy that eliminate the need for a fully trusted central data collector, but overcome the limitations of local differential privacy. This interest has led to the introduction of the shuffle model (Cheu et al., EUROCRYPT 2019; Erlingsson et al., SODA 2019) and revisiting the pan-private model (Dwork et al., ITCS 2010). The message of this line of work is that, for a variety of low-dimensional problems -- such as counts, means, and histograms -- these intermediate models offer nearly as much power as centra…
Consider the setup where $n$ parties are each given a number $x_i \in \mathbb{F}_q$ and the goal is to compute the sum $\sum_i x_i$ in a secure fashion and with as little communication as possible. We study this problem in the anonymized model of Ishai et al. (FOCS 2006) where each party may broadcast anonymous messages on an insecure channel. We present a new analysis of the one-round "split and mix" protocol of Ishai et al. In order to achieve the same security parameter, our analysis reduces the required number of messages by a $Θ(\log n)$ multiplicative factor. We complement our positive r…
Massachusetts Institute of Technology（麻省理工学院）；Google Research（谷歌研究院）
We study the setup where each of $n$ users holds an element from a discrete set, and the goal is to count the number of distinct elements across all users, under the constraint of $(ε, δ)$-differentially privacy: - In the non-interactive local setting, we prove that the additive error of any protocol is $Ω(n)$ for any constant $ε$ and for any $δ$ inverse polynomial in $n$. - In the single-message shuffle setting, we prove a lower bound of $Ω(n)$ on the error for any constant $ε$ and for some $δ$ inverse quasi-polynomial in $n$. We do so by building on the moment-matching method from the litera…
Differential privacy (DP) is a formal notion for quantifying the privacy loss of algorithms. Algorithms in the central model of DP achieve high accuracy but make the strongest trust assumptions whereas those in the local DP model make the weakest trust assumptions but incur substantial accuracy loss. The shuffled DP model (Bittau et al., 2017; Erlingsson et al., 2019; Cheu et al., 2019) has recently emerged as a feasible middle ground between the central and local models, providing stronger trust assumptions than the former while promising higher accuracies than the latter. In this paper, we o…
Recently, a number of approaches and techniques have been introduced for reporting software statistics with strong privacy guarantees. These range from abstract algorithms to comprehensive systems with varying assumptions and built upon local differential privacy mechanisms and anonymity. Based on the Encode-Shuffle-Analyze (ESA) framework, notable results formally clarified large improvements in privacy guarantees without loss of utility by making reports anonymous. However, these results either comprise of systems with seemingly disparate mechanisms and attack models, or formal statements wi…
The Alan Turing Institute（艾伦·图灵研究所）；Cambridge University（剑桥大学）；Warwick University（华威大学）；Georgetown University（乔治城大学）
This work studies differential privacy in the context of the recently proposed shuffle model. Unlike in the local model, where the server collecting privatized data from users can track back an input to a specific user, in the shuffle model users submit their privatized inputs to a server anonymously. This setup yields a trust model which sits in between the classical curator and local models for differential privacy. The shuffle model is the core idea in the Encode, Shuffle, Analyze (ESA) model introduced by Bittau et al. (SOPS 2017). Recent work by Cheu et al. (EUROCRYPT 2019) analyzes the d…
Recent work in differential privacy has explored the prospect of combining local randomization with a secure intermediary. Specifically, there are a variety of protocols in the secure shuffle model (where an intermediary randomly permutes messages) as well as the secure aggregation model (where an intermediary adds messages). Most of these protocols are limited to approximate differential privacy. An exception is the shuffle protocol by Ghazi, Golowich, Kumar, Manurangsi, Pagh, and Velingker (arXiv:2002.01919): it computes bounded sums under pure differential privacy. Its additive error is $\t…
A protocol by Ishai et al.\ (FOCS 2006) showing how to implement distributed $n$-party summation from secure shuffling has regained relevance in the context of the recently proposed \emph{shuffle model} of differential privacy, as it allows to attain the accuracy levels of the curator model at a moderate communication cost. To achieve statistical security $2^{-σ}$, the protocol by Ishai et al.\ requires the number of messages sent by each party to {\em grow} logarithmically with $n$ as $O(\log n + σ)$. In this note we give an improved analysis achieving a dependency of the form $O(1+σ/\log n)$…
The pervasive adoption of Internet-connected digital services has led to a growing concern in the personal data privacy of their customers. On the other hand, machine learning (ML) techniques have been widely adopted by digital service providers to improve operational productivity and customer satisfaction. ML inevitably accesses and processes users' personal data, which could potentially breach the relevant privacy protection regulations if not performed carefully. The situation is exacerbated by the cloud-based implementation of digital services when user data are captured and stored in dist…
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative training among mutually distrusting parties. Model updates, rather than training data, are concentrated and fused in a central aggregation server. A key security challenge in FL is that an untrustworthy or compromised aggregation process might lead to unforeseeable information leakage. This challenge is especially acute due to recently demonstrated attacks that have reconstructed large fractions of training data from ostensibly "sanitized" model updates. In this paper, we introduce TRUDA, a new cross-silo FL system, employing a trustworthy and dece…
We consider the problem of designing scalable, robust protocols for computing statistics about sensitive data. Specifically, we look at how best to design differentially private protocols in a distributed setting, where each user holds a private datum. The literature has mostly considered two models: the "central" model, in which a trusted server collects users' data in the clear, which allows greater accuracy; and the "local" model, in which users individually randomize their data, and need not trust the server, but accuracy is limited. Attempts to achieve the accuracy of the central model wi…
Sun Yat-sen University（中山大学）；University of California, San Diego（加州大学圣地亚哥分校）
This paper aims at jointly addressing two seemly conflicting issues in federated learning: differential privacy (DP) and Byzantine-robustness, which are particularly challenging when the distributed data are non-i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed). The standard DP mechanisms add noise to the transmitted messages, and entangles with robust stochastic gradient aggregation to defend against Byzantine attacks. In this paper, we decouple the two issues via robust stochastic model aggregation, in the sense that our proposed DP mechanisms and the defense against Byzantine attacks have se…
