arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.11154cs.CVcs.LGeess.IV
收藏

A Systematic Evaluation: Fine-Grained CNN vs. Traditional CNN Classifiers

Australian National University(澳大利亚国立大学);Data61-Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization(Data61-联邦科学与工业研究组织);Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization(联邦科学与工业研究组织);The University of Technology Sydney(悉尼科技大学)

Saeed Anwar, Nick Barnes, Lars Petersson

英文摘要:

To make the best use of the underlying minute and subtle differences, fine-grained classifiers collect information about inter-class variations. The task is very challenging due to the small differences between the colors, viewpoint, and structure in the same class entities. The classification becomes more difficult due to the similarities between the differences in viewpoint with other classes and differences with its own. In this work, we investigate the performance of the landmark general CNN classifiers, which presented top-notch results on large scale classification datasets, on the fine-grained datasets, and compare it against state-of-the-art fine-grained classifiers. In this paper, we pose two specific questions: (i) Do the general CNN classifiers achieve comparable results to fine-grained classifiers? (ii) Do general CNN classifiers require any specific information to improve upon the fine-grained ones? Throughout this work, we train the general CNN classifiers without introducing any aspect that is specific to fine-grained datasets. We show an extensive evaluation on six datasets to determine whether the fine-grained classifier is able to elevate the baseline in their experiments.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑