arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.08821cs.CVcs.LGstat.ML
收藏

DHOG:深度层次对象查询

DHOG: Deep Hierarchical Object Grouping

University of Edinburgh(爱丁堡大学);School of Informatics(信息学院)

Luke Nicholas Darlow, Amos Storkey

摘要:

最近,一些有竞争力的方法已经解决了无监督的表示学习,通过最大化的表示之间的互信息产生的扩增。然后,所得到的表示对于随机增强策略是不变的,并且可以用于下游任务,例如聚类或分类。然而,数据增强保留了图像的许多属性,因此存在依赖于匹配数据中容易找到的特征的次优表示选择的可能性。我们证明,贪婪或本地的方法最大化互信息(如随机梯度优化)发现局部最优的互信息标准,所得到的表示也不太理想地适合于复杂的下游任务。早期的工作没有具体确定或解决这个问题。我们介绍了深层对象分组(DHOG),计算了一些不同的离散表示的图像的层次顺序,最终生成表示,更好地优化的互信息的目标。我们还发现,这些表示更好地与分组到底层对象类的下游任务。我们在无监督聚类上测试了DHOG,这是一种自然的下游测试,因为目标表示是数据的离散标记。我们在三个主要的基准测试中取得了新的最先进的结果,而没有任何预滤波或Sobel边缘检测,这被证明是许多以前的方法工作所必需的。我们获得的准确性提高:CIFAR-10为4.3%,CIFAR-100-20为1.5%,SVHN为7.2%。

英文摘要:

Recently, a number of competitive methods have tackled unsupervised representation learning by maximising the mutual information between the representations produced from augmentations. The resulting representations are then invariant to stochastic augmentation strategies, and can be used for downstream tasks such as clustering or classification. Yet data augmentations preserve many properties of an image and so there is potential for a suboptimal choice of representation that relies on matching easy-to-find features in the data. We demonstrate that greedy or local methods of maximising mutual information (such as stochastic gradient optimisation) discover local optima of the mutual information criterion; the resulting representations are also less-ideally suited to complex downstream tasks. Earlier work has not specifically identified or addressed this issue. We introduce deep hierarchical object grouping (DHOG) that computes a number of distinct discrete representations of images in a hierarchical order, eventually generating representations that better optimise the mutual information objective. We also find that these representations align better with the downstream task of grouping into underlying object classes. We tested DHOG on unsupervised clustering, which is a natural downstream test as the target representation is a discrete labelling of the data. We achieved new state-of-the-art results on the three main benchmarks without any prefiltering or Sobel-edge detection that proved necessary for many previous methods to work. We obtain accuracy improvements of: 4.3% on CIFAR-10, 1.5% on CIFAR-100-20, and 7.2% on SVHN.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑