arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.02460cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML

A Closer Look at Accuracy vs. Robustness

University of California, San Diego(加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校);Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago(芝加哥丰田工业大学);Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学)

Yao-Yuan Yang, Cyrus Rashtchian, Hongyang Zhang, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Kamalika Chaudhuri

英文摘要:

Current methods for training robust networks lead to a drop in test accuracy, which has led prior works to posit that a robustness-accuracy tradeoff may be inevitable in deep learning. We take a closer look at this phenomenon and first show that real image datasets are actually separated. With this property in mind, we then prove that robustness and accuracy should both be achievable for benchmark datasets through locally Lipschitz functions, and hence, there should be no inherent tradeoff between robustness and accuracy. Through extensive experiments with robustness methods, we argue that the gap between theory and practice arises from two limitations of current methods: either they fail to impose local Lipschitzness or they are insufficiently generalized. We explore combining dropout with robust training methods and obtain better generalization. We conclude that achieving robustness and accuracy in practice may require using methods that impose local Lipschitzness and augmenting them with deep learning generalization techniques. Code available at https://github.com/yangarbiter/robust-local-lipschitz

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑