arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1901.08573cs.LGstat.ML

Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracy

CMU(卡内基梅隆大学);TTIC(丰田理工学院芝加哥分校);University of Virginia(弗吉尼亚大学);UC Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校);Petuum Inc.(Petuum公司)

Hongyang Zhang, Yaodong Yu, Jiantao Jiao, Eric P. Xing, Laurent El Ghaoui, Michael I. Jordan

英文摘要:

We identify a trade-off between robustness and accuracy that serves as a guiding principle in the design of defenses against adversarial examples. Although this problem has been widely studied empirically, much remains unknown concerning the theory underlying this trade-off. In this work, we decompose the prediction error for adversarial examples (robust error) as the sum of the natural (classification) error and boundary error, and provide a differentiable upper bound using the theory of classification-calibrated loss, which is shown to be the tightest possible upper bound uniform over all probability distributions and measurable predictors. Inspired by our theoretical analysis, we also design a new defense method, TRADES, to trade adversarial robustness off against accuracy. Our proposed algorithm performs well experimentally in real-world datasets. The methodology is the foundation of our entry to the NeurIPS 2018 Adversarial Vision Challenge in which we won the 1st place out of ~2,000 submissions, surpassing the runner-up approach by $11.41\%$ in terms of mean $\ell_2$ perturbation distance.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑