arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2002.11059cs.NI
收藏

NFV平台设计:综述

NFV Platform Design: A Survey

Tianzhu Zhang

AI总结:

本文综述了NFV平台设计,分析了现有平台的架构和分类,并探讨了设计空间和实现选择,为运营商提供选择指南。

摘要:

由于传统网络固有的服务部署效率低下,网络功能虚拟化(NFV)持续受到产业界和学术界的关注。通过用软件网络功能替代专用、昂贵、专有网络设备,并在通用硬件上集中部署,NFV设想了一种更加敏捷和开放的服务部署范式,具有显著降低资本支出(CapEx)和运营支出(OpEx)的优势。然而,就像任何复杂系统一样,NFV平台通常由大量软件和硬件组件组成,并且通常基于不同的动机或用例采用不同的设计选择。这种广泛而复杂的替代方案集合使得网络运营商在做出正确选择时极为困难。尽管已经有许多努力研究NFV的不同方面,但没有一项研究专门针对NFV平台或试图探索设计空间。在本文中,我们对NFV平台设计进行了全面的综述。我们的研究仅针对现有的NFV平台实现。我们从标准参考NFV平台的架构观点开始,并基于设计的主要目的提出了现有NFV平台的分类。然后我们深入探讨了设计空间,并详细阐述了每个平台所采用的实现选择。我们相信,我们的研究为网络运营商或服务提供商提供了一个详细的指南,以根据各自的需求选择或实现最合适的NFV平台。需要注意的是,本报告是已发表的IEEE TNSM论文[1]的补充文档。我们将定期更新此文档,以包含新提出的NFV平台和设计选择。

英文摘要:

Due to the intrinsically inefficient service provisioning in traditional networks, Network Function Virtualization (NFV) keeps gaining attention from both industry and academia. By replacing the purpose-built, expensive, proprietary network equipment with software network functions consolidated on commodity hardware, NFV envisions a shift towards a more agile and open service provisioning paradigm with much lower capital expenditure (CapEx) and operational expenditure (OpEx). Nonetheless, just like any complex system, NFV platforms commonly consist of abounding software and hardware components and usually incorporate disparate design choices based on distinct motivations or use cases. This broad collection of convoluted alternatives makes it extremely arduous for network operators to make proper choices. Although numerous efforts have been devoted to investigating different aspects of NFV, none of them specifically focused on NFV platforms or attempted to explore the design space. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey on NFV platform design. Our study solely targets existing NFV platform implementations. We begin with an architectural view of the standard reference NFV platform and present our taxonomy of existing NFV platforms based on the principal purpose of design. Then we thoroughly explore the design space and elaborate on the implementation choices each platform opts for. We believe that our study gives a detailed guideline for network operators or service providers to choose or implement the most appropriate NFV platforms based on their respective requirements. Note that this report serves as a complementary document for a published IEEE TNSM paper [1]. We will periodically update this document to include the newly proposed NFV platforms and design choices.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑