Alan E. Robinson, Émile Michaud
In their recent preprint [arXiv:2002.06937], Kurinsky, Baxter, Kahn, and Krnjaic assume an unphysical ionization yield for plasmon excitations in order to claim a possible dark matter signal. Their proposed signal is not possible based on known physics, but their proposed detection method warrants further investigation.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
继续探索
A Reply to "Comment on `Finding the $0^{--}$ Glueball' " [arXiv:1702.06634] and comment on `Is the exotic $0^{--}$ glueball a pure gluon state?' [arXiv:1611.08698]
Comment on arXiv:2510.21705 "Fundamental Impossibility of a Superradiant Neutrino Laser" and comment on arXiv:2510.21692 "Can Bose-Einstein Condensates Enhance Radioactive Decay?"
本文针对两篇arXiv预印本发表评论，指出中微子截面极小，实验室中不存在超辐射现象。
A reply to arXiv:0809.2310, "Comment on Universal Charge-Radius Relation for Subatomic and Astrophysical Compact Objects" [arXiv:0804.2140,PRL100(2008)151102]
A reasonably short antineutrino run using OPERA and/or MINOS may test J. Franklin's explanation of recently claimed $ν_μ$ superluminality.
Savage et al. have recently put forward the claim that results from the XENON10 experiment are incompatible with the totality of both DAMA/LIBRA and CoGeNT experimental regions. In this brief note the source of this erroneous conclusion is identified in a misinterpretation of the XENON10 efficiency in the detection of S1 light from low-energy nuclear recoils.
A Comment on the Letter by C. F. Qiao and L. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 221601 (2014) [arXiv:1408.3995]
In arXiv:1401.3025 a new mechanism of energy loss by primordial black holes passing through neutron stars has been proposed, which is more efficient, by many orders of magnitude, than the existing ones. In this comment we point out a problem in the calculations of arXiv:1401.3025 that may invalidate the result.
We reply to misleading claims made in a comment to our work by Birse and McGovern in arXiv:1708.09341.
Here I explain why critics of my work [arXiv:1104.5314] in the above paper [arXiv:1306.5210] is inadequate.
It is discussed the inconsistency of the so-called ladder-rainbow truncation scheme to QCD in the framework of the Dyson-Schwinger equation for the quark propagator and the Bethe-Salpeter equation for the bound state of mesons.
We comment on a statement made in arXiv:1107.0403, which implies that the model of gravitino dark matter from Q-ball decay we presented in arXiv:1101.5328 is generally ruled out by the effect of NLSP decay on BBN. We explain why this statement is incorrect.
We show that the term maintaining conservation of the charged vector current for the transitions "neutron <-> proton" even for different masses of the neutron and proton (see T. Leitner et al., Phys. Rev. C {\bf 73}, 065502 (2006) and A. M. Ankowski, arXiv:1601.06169 [hep-ph]) is related to the first class current contribution but not to the second class one as has been pointed out by C. Giunti, arXiv: 1602.00215 [hep-ph].
A few final comments on arXiv:1210.7548 are given to confute incorrect arguments claimed there.
In contrast to Trojan and Vlasov [arXiv:1103.2276 (hep-ph)], it is found that an ideal Fermi gas of tachyons has a subluminous velocity of sound for any particle density and, therefore, the causality condition for a tachyon gas holds always true. Also, an ideal Fermi gas of tachyons never possesses an exotic equation of state with the pressure exceeding the energy density.
Comment on "Electromagnetic form factors for nucleons in short-range correlations": arXiv:2305.13666
本文指出，核夸克结构函数的介质修改与弹性电磁形式因子的介质修改之间的关系是依赖于模型的。
In the Comment we scrutinized the quartet basis for the Delta resonances, and the high-momentum truncation scheme, suggested by Bicudo et al. Not all the results and claims has been properly justified by the authors.
The referred-to paper on antiproton production contains two errors: an error in the value reported for one of the fit parameters and an error in units. I give the errors and the corrected values when possible.
In this note my personal point of view on the question brought up for a discussion at the Conference "Diffraction 2008" by Andre Martin has been presented.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors after discussing its content with Dr. J. Madsen.
We briefly remind references and arguments, already discussed in the past, which confute erroneous claims in arXiv:1210.5501.
In a recent paper (arXiv:1403.5221), Kang et al.proposed the so-called "rapidity factorization" for the single inclusive forward hadron production in pA collisions. We point out that the leading small-x logarithm was mis-identified in this paper, and hence the newly added next-to-leading order correction term is unjustified and should be absent in view of the small-x factorization.
This paper contains our comments on the work of the authors A. I. Ahmadov \textit{et al.} "Single meson production in photon-photon collisions and infrared renormalons" [arXiv:0911.5226v1 27 Nov 2009]. We draw attention to errors made in this work in calculation of the subprocess cross sections within the frozen and running coupling approaches, in deriving the Borel transforms and Borel resummed expressions for the cross sections in the running coupling approach. We show that the same fatal errors were made by these authors also in their work published in Phys. Rev. D80, 016003 (2009).
扫码添加微信好友，提出您的宝贵建议 👇
💡 备注请填写：网站反馈
发表机构由 AI 从论文文本抽取，如发现错误，欢迎反馈修正建议。