Today, AI is increasingly being used in many high-stakes decision-making applications in which fairness is an important concern. Already, there are many examples of AI being biased and making questionable and unfair decisions. The AI research community has proposed many methods to measure and mitigate unwanted biases, but few of them involve inputs from human policy makers. We argue that because different fairness criteria sometimes cannot be simultaneously satisfied, and because achieving fairness often requires sacrificing other objectives such as model accuracy, it is key to acquire and adhere to human policy makers' preferences on how to make the tradeoff among these objectives. In this paper, we propose a framework and some exemplar methods for eliciting such preferences and for optimizing an AI model according to these preferences.
City, University of London（伦敦城市大学）；Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe（富士通欧洲实验室）；Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.（意大利联合圣保罗银行）
With Artificial intelligence (AI) to aid or automate decision-making advancing rapidly, a particular concern is its fairness. In order to create reliable, safe and trustworthy systems through human-centred artificial intelligence (HCAI) design, recent efforts have produced user interfaces (UIs) for AI experts to investigate the fairness of AI models. In this work, we provide a design space exploration that supports not only data scientists but also domain experts to investigate AI fairness. Using loan applications as an example, we held a series of workshops with loan officers and data scienti…
EARN Fairness: Explaining, Asking, Reviewing, and Negotiating Artificial Intelligence Fairness Metrics Among Stakeholders
School of Computing Science, University of Glasgow（格拉斯哥大学计算科学学院）；FUJITSU LIMITED（富士通有限公司）；Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo（东京大学文理研究生院）；Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, FUJITSU LIMITED（富士通有限公司人工智能实验室）
The McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin（德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校麦库姆斯商学院）；LMU Munich（慕尼黑大学）
The extensive adoption of business analytics (BA) has brought financial gains and increased efficiencies. However, these advances have simultaneously drawn attention to rising legal and ethical challenges when BA inform decisions with fairness implications. As a response to these concerns, the emerging study of algorithmic fairness deals with algorithmic outputs that may result in disparate outcomes or other forms of injustices for subgroups of the population, especially those who have been historically marginalized. Fairness is relevant on the basis of legal compliance, social responsibility,…
Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea（统计系，首尔国立大学，大韩民国）；School of Law, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea（法学院，首尔国立大学，大韩民国）
Algorithmic fairness is a major concern in recent years as the influence of machine learning algorithms becomes more widespread. In this paper, we investigate the issue of algorithmic fairness from a network-centric perspective. Specifically, we introduce a novel yet intuitive function known as network-centric fairness perception and provide an axiomatic approach to analyze its properties. Using a peer-review network as case study, we also examine its utility in terms of assessing the perception of fairness in paper acceptance decisions. We show how the function can be extended to a group fair…
Position: Beyond Sensitive Attributes, ML Fairness Should Quantify Structural Injustice via Social Determinants
University of California, Berkeley（加州大学伯克利分校）；University of Cambridge（剑桥大学）；University of Washington（华盛顿大学）；University of Michigan（密歇根大学）；University of Toronto（多伦多大学）
Stony Brook University（石溪大学）；Los Altos High School（洛斯阿尔托斯高中）
Understanding the cumulative effect of multiple fairness enhancing interventions at different stages of the machine learning (ML) pipeline is a critical and underexplored facet of the fairness literature. Such knowledge can be valuable to data scientists/ML practitioners in designing fair ML pipelines. This paper takes the first step in exploring this area by undertaking an extensive empirical study comprising 60 combinations of interventions, 9 fairness metrics, 2 utility metrics (Accuracy and F1 Score) across 4 benchmark datasets. We quantitatively analyze the experimental data to measure th…
University of Toronto（多伦多大学）；Vector Institute（向量研究所）
Deploying machine learning (ML) models often requires both fairness and privacy guarantees. Both of these objectives present unique trade-offs with the utility (e.g., accuracy) of the model. However, the mutual interactions between fairness, privacy, and utility are less well-understood. As a result, often only one objective is optimized, while the others are tuned as hyper-parameters. Because they implicitly prioritize certain objectives, such designs bias the model in pernicious, undetectable ways. To address this, we adopt impartiality as a principle: design of ML pipelines should not favor…
Recent studies on disparate impact in machine learning applications have sparked a debate around the concept of fairness along with attempts to formalize its different criteria. Many of these approaches focus on reducing prediction errors while maximizing sole utility of the institution. This work seeks to reconceptualize and critically frame the existing discourse on fairness by underlining the implicit biases embedded in common understandings of fairness in the literature and how they contrast with its corresponding economic and legal definitions. This paper expands the concept of utility an…
Facebook AI；LAMSADE, Université PSL, Université Paris Dauphine, CNRS（LAMSADE，巴黎PSL大学，巴黎多芬大学，法国国家科学研究中心）
We consider the problem of generating rankings that are fair towards both users and item producers in recommender systems. We address both usual recommendation (e.g., of music or movies) and reciprocal recommendation (e.g., dating). Following concepts of distributive justice in welfare economics, our notion of fairness aims at increasing the utility of the worse-off individuals, which we formalize using the criterion of Lorenz efficiency. It guarantees that rankings are Pareto efficient, and that they maximally redistribute utility from better-off to worse-off, at a given level of overall util…
FedPF: Accurate Target Privacy Preserving Federated Learning Balancing Fairness and Utility
The School of Computer Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China（上海交通大学计算机科学学院，上海，中国）；The Shanghai Key Laboratory of Integrated Administration Technologies for Information Security, Shanghai, China（上海信息安全集成管理技术重点实验室，上海，中国）；The School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China（香港中文大学（深圳）科学与工程学院，中国）
University of Cagliari（卡利亚里大学）；Polytechnic University of Turin（都灵理工大学）
Path reasoning is a notable recommendation approach that models high-order user-product relations, based on a Knowledge Graph (KG). This approach can extract reasoning paths between recommended products and already experienced products and, then, turn such paths into textual explanations for the user. Unfortunately, evaluation protocols in this field appear heterogeneous and limited, making it hard to contextualize the impact of the existing methods. In this paper, we replicated three state-of-the-art relevant path reasoning recommendation methods proposed in top-tier conferences. Under a comm…
University of Oslo（奥斯陆大学）；Inria（法国国家信息与自动化研究所）；Univ. Lille（里尔大学）；Centrale Lille（里尔中央理工学院）；University of Neuchatel（纳沙泰尔大学）
Typically, merit is defined with respect to some intrinsic measure of worth. We instead consider a setting where an individual's worth is \emph{relative}: when a Decision Maker (DM) selects a set of individuals from a population to maximise expected utility, it is natural to consider the \emph{Expected Marginal Contribution} (EMC) of each person to the utility. We show that this notion satisfies an axiomatic definition of fairness for this setting. We also show that for certain policy structures, this notion of fairness is aligned with maximising expected utility, while for linear utility func…
We study fairness through the lens of cooperative multi-agent learning. Our work is motivated by empirical evidence that naive maximization of team reward yields unfair outcomes for individual team members. To address fairness in multi-agent contexts, we introduce team fairness, a group-based fairness measure for multi-agent learning. We then prove that it is possible to enforce team fairness during policy optimization by transforming the team's joint policy into an equivariant map. We refer to our multi-agent learning strategy as Fairness through Equivariance (Fair-E) and demonstrate its effe…
Seldon（塞尔顿）；University of California San Diego（加州大学圣地亚哥分校）；Ford R&A（福特研发中心）；University of Oxford（牛津大学）；OpenMined（开放挖掘）
Deployment of deep learning in different fields and industries is growing day by day due to its performance, which relies on the availability of data and compute. Data is often crowd-sourced and contains sensitive information about its contributors, which leaks into models that are trained on it. To achieve rigorous privacy guarantees, differentially private training mechanisms are used. However, it has recently been shown that differential privacy can exacerbate existing biases in the data and have disparate impacts on the accuracy of different subgroups of data. In this paper, we aim to stud…
Humans are increasingly coming into contact with artificial intelligence and machine learning systems. Human-centered artificial intelligence is a perspective on AI and ML that algorithms must be designed with awareness that they are part of a larger system consisting of humans. We lay forth an argument that human-centered artificial intelligence can be broken down into two aspects: (1) AI systems that understand humans from a sociocultural perspective, and (2) AI systems that help humans understand them. We further argue that issues of social responsibility such as fairness, accountability, i…
Fairness in multiwinner elections is studied in varying contexts. For instance, diversity of candidates and representation of voters are both separately termed as being fair. A common denominator to ensure fairness across all such contexts is the use of constraints. However, across these contexts, the candidates selected to satisfy the given constraints may systematically lead to unfair outcomes for historically disadvantaged voter populations as the cost of fairness may be borne unequally. Hence, we develop a model to select candidates that satisfy the constraints fairly across voter populati…
Avoiding Structural Failure Modes in Tabular Fair SSL: Online Primal-Dual Allocation under Confidence Gating
College of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, China（吉林大学计算机科学与技术学院）；Key Laboratory of Symbolic Computation and Knowledge Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Jilin University, China（教育部符号计算与知识工程重点实验室）
Contemporary recommender systems act as intermediaries on multi-sided platforms serving high utility recommendations from sellers to buyers. Such systems attempt to balance the objectives of multiple stakeholders including sellers, buyers, and the platform itself. The difficulty in providing recommendations that maximize the utility for a buyer, while simultaneously representing all the sellers on the platform has lead to many interesting research problems.Traditionally, they have been formulated as integer linear programs which compute recommendations for all the buyers together in an \emph{o…
