arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2001.07859stat.MEcs.LGstat.ML
收藏

一种用于高维探索性项目因子分析的深度学习算法

A Deep Learning Algorithm for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill(北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校)

Christopher J. Urban, Daniel J. Bauer

AI总结:

本文提出基于重要性加权自编码器(IWAE)的深度学习变分推断方法,用于高维探索性项目因子分析,可在大型数据和多潜在因子场景下快速获得接近MML的估计。

摘要:

边际最大似然(MML)估计是心理测量学中拟合项目反应理论模型的首选方法,因为当样本量趋于无穷大时,MML估计量具有一致性、正态性和有效性。然而,当样本量和潜在因子数量非常大时,诸如Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro(MH-RM)算法等最先进的MML估计程序,以及变分推断(VI)等近似MML估计程序,在计算上都非常耗时。在本研究中,我们研究了一种用于探索性项目因子分析(IFA)的基于深度学习的VI算法,即使在具有许多潜在因子的大型数据集中,该算法也具有很快的计算速度。所提出的方法将一种称为重要性加权自编码器(IWAE)的深度人工神经网络模型应用于探索性IFA。IWAE使用重要性采样技术来近似MML估计量,其中在拟合期间增加抽取的重要性加权(IW)样本数量可以改善近似效果,但通常会以降低计算效率为代价。我们提供了一个真实数据应用,该应用在不同随机起点下恢复了与心理学理论一致的结果。通过模拟研究,我们表明,随着样本量或IW样本数量的增加,IWAE会产生更准确的估计(尽管因子相关性和截距估计表现出一定偏差),并以更少的时间获得与MH-RM相似的结果。我们的模拟还表明,所提出方法的表现与受约束联合最大似然估计相似,并且可能更快;后者是一种快速程序,在样本量和项目数量同时趋于无穷大时具有一致性。

英文摘要:

Marginal maximum likelihood (MML) estimation is the preferred approach to fitting item response theory models in psychometrics due to the MML estimator's consistency, normality, and efficiency as the sample size tends to infinity. However, state-of-the-art MML estimation procedures such as the Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro (MH-RM) algorithm as well as approximate MML estimation procedures such as variational inference (VI) are computationally time-consuming when the sample size and the number of latent factors are very large. In this work, we investigate a deep learning-based VI algorithm for exploratory item factor analysis (IFA) that is computationally fast even in large data sets with many latent factors. The proposed approach applies a deep artificial neural network model called an importance-weighted autoencoder (IWAE) for exploratory IFA. The IWAE approximates the MML estimator using an importance sampling technique wherein increasing the number of importance-weighted (IW) samples drawn during fitting improves the approximation, typically at the cost of decreased computational efficiency. We provide a real data application that recovers results aligning with psychological theory across random starts. Via simulation studies, we show that the IWAE yields more accurate estimates as either the sample size or the number of IW samples increases (although factor correlation and intercepts estimates exhibit some bias) and obtains similar results to MH-RM in less time. Our simulations also suggest that the proposed approach performs similarly to and is potentially faster than constrained joint maximum likelihood estimation, a fast procedure that is consistent when the sample size and the number of items simultaneously tend to infinity.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑