Foundations of Quantum Mechanics according to my teachers
英文摘要:
These are author's recollections of informal discussions on foundations of quantum mechanics, which happened in his presence in 1970-80s
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。
P. B. Lerner
These are author's recollections of informal discussions on foundations of quantum mechanics, which happened in his presence in 1970-80s
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。
继续探索
Von Neumann's 1927 Trilogy on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Annotated Translations
该文呈现冯·诺依曼1927年量子力学基础三部曲的英文译本,含引言与详细评注,旨在提供历史文献的准确翻译与学术解读。
A Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes Toward Quantum Mechanics
量子力学的基础研究,包括实验和理论,催生了量子信息科学领域。尽管如此,量子力学本身的基础在科学界仍然存在激烈的争论,在基本问题上还没有达成共识。在这里,我们提出了一项民意调查的结果进行了33个与会者的基础上的量子力学。参与者完成了一份问卷,其中包含16个多项选择题,探讨对量子基础问题的看法。与会者包括物理学家、哲学家和数学家。我们描述我们的研究结果,确定共同持有的观点,并确定强,中,弱的答案之间的相关性。我们的研究提供了量子基础领域当前观点的独特快照,以及对这些观点之间关系的分析。
Yet Another Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes Toward Quantum Mechanics
最近,Schlosshauer、Kofler和Zeilinger [arXiv:1301.1069]在一次量子基础会议上对33名与会者进行了一项调查,以探讨受访者对量子力学中各种基础问题的看法。在这里,我们报告了在最近的另一次量子基金会会议上对与会者进行同样调查的结果。虽然很难从民意调查中得出任何具有科学意义的结论,但调查结果确实有力地表明了几个有趣的文化事实-例如,在“量子基础”的广泛领域内,存在着观点截然不同的亚社区,并且(相关地)关于几个基本问题的争议可能比已经存在的更多-这是在早期的调查中发现的。
In-principle restrictions on the amount of information that can be gathered about a system have been proposed as a foundational principle in several recent reconstructions of the formalism of quantum mechanics. However, it seems unclear precisely why one should be thus restricted. We investigate the notion of paradoxical self-reference as a possible origin of such epistemic horizons by means of a fixed-point theorem in Cartesian closed categories due to F. W. Lawvere that illuminates and unifies the different perspectives on self-reference.
Another Survey of Foundational Attitudes Towards Quantum Mechanics
量子力学诞生至今已近百年,但关于量子力学解释的讨论却从未停止过。因此,对有关这一问题的意见进行调查特别有意义。这项调查是根据Schlosshauer等人的想法和方法进行的(arXiv:1301.1069 [quant-ph]),但在一个略有不同的群体中进行。它应该给出对量子力学解释的态度的另一个快照,并保持关于这个话题的讨论活跃。
Tightrope-walking rationality in action: Feyerabendian insights for the foundations of quantum mechanics
本文梳理费耶阿本德关于量子力学及实在论、客观性、多元主义等一般哲学观点,揭示其对当代量子力学基础争论的启发价值。
Karl Popper and Paul Feyerabend have been among the most influential philosophers of science of the twentieth century. Extensive studies have been dedicated to the development of their controversial relationship, which saw Feyerabend turning from a student and supporter of Popper to one of his harshest critics. Yet, it is not as well known that the rift between Popper and Feyerabend generated mainly in the context of their studies on the foundation of quantum mechanics, which has been the main subject of their discussions for about two decades. This paper reconstructs in detail their diatribe …
The Superposition Principle in Quantum Mechanics - did the rock enter the foundation surreptitiously?
叠加原理构成了量子理论的主干。由此产生的量子理论的线性结构在结构上是如此的严格,以至于篡改它可能会产生严重的,似乎是非物理的后果。这一原理甚至在最高的可用加速器能量下也是成功的。那么,量子理论的这个方面是永远存在的吗?目前的工作是试图了解态度的创始人,特别是玻尔和狄拉克,对这一原则。海森堡矩阵力学一方面,和薛定谔波动力学的其他,严格审查,以阐明这一原则如何进入量子理论的基础。
Alain Aspect's three experiments on Bell's theorem, published in the early 1980s, were a turning point in the history of the research on the foundations of quantum mechanics not only because they corroborated entanglement as the distinctive quantum signature but also because these experiments brought wider recognition to this field of research and Aspect himself. These experiments may be considered the most direct precursors of the research on quantum information, which would blossom a decade later.
We argue that Anton Zeilinger's "foundational conceptual principle" for quantum mechanics according to which an elementary system carries one bit of information is an idealistic principle, which should be replaced by a realistic principle of contextuality. Specific properties of quantum systems are a consequence of impossibility to speak about them without reference to the tools of their observation (identification) and, consequently, context in which these tools are applied. In particular, the assumption of non-locality is not required to explain quantum correlation. Correlated quantum events…
Philosophical foundations of interpretations of quantum mechanics
论证了量子力学解释的多样性的原因是它们与经典物理学之间没有连续性关系,以及态矢量的操作性定义的不可能性。问题在于解释的哲学基础不相容,这导致难以建立一个统一的世界图景。为了解决这个问题,我们确定了量子力学解释的一般哲学基础,并建立了它们的分类。我们还表明,在更一般的理论,其中的一部分是量子力学,这是可能的整合(调和)解释的哲学基础。
Surveying the Attitudes of Physicists Concerning Foundational Issues of Quantum Mechanics
尽管量子力学已经存在了近100年,但有关该理论的基础和解释的问题仍然存在。近年来,这些问题引起了更多的关注,但这是否意味着物理学家对量子力学的基础问题有了更多的认识?一项调查被发送到隶属于8所不同大学的1234名物理学家。149回答了这些问题,这些问题既涉及具体与量子力学有关的基本问题,也涉及一般物理理论的解释问题。调查的答案显示,量子力学中的基本概念仍然是一个只有少数物理学家熟悉的话题,尽管大多数物理学家发现对物理理论的解释很重要。各种问题,以及如何回答,提出。该调查旨在概述物理学界对量子力学相关问题的一般看法。
Elementary Considerations on the Interpretation of the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
这篇论文出现在题为“科学论文提交给马克斯出生对他的退休从泰特主席自然哲学在爱丁堡大学”,发表于1953年(奥利弗和博伊德),第33-40页。
Remembering a Great Teacher
这篇文章是对参加费曼在巴西开设的量子力学课程的难忘经历的回忆,以及我和丹尼尔·阿马蒂多年来在美国和欧洲与他的几次会面和交流。这篇文章还包括一个小样本的问题分配的过程中,一个单页的指南,手写的费曼,研究量子电动力学的基础上,他的两个最重要的文件,和他的答复,一封信的祝贺信,作者曾寄给他的场合,他的诺贝尔奖。
I will argue, pace a great many of my contemporaries, that there's something right about Boltzmann's attempt to ground the second law of thermodynamics in a suitably amended deterministic time-reversal invariant classical dynamics, and that in order to appreciate what's right about (what was at least at one time) Boltzmann's explanatory project, one has to fully apprehend the nature of microphysical causal structure, time-reversal invariance, and the relationship between Boltzmann entropy and the work of Rudolf Clausius.
Foundations of statistical mechanics from symmetries of entanglement
不变性--纠缠辅助不变性--是最近发现的复合量子系统的对称性。我们表明,热力学平衡态的特点是他们的不变性。特别地,具有哈密顿量$H_\mathcal{S}$的系统$\mathcal{S} $的微正则平衡在每个么正变换下都是完全能量简并的量子态不变量。正则平衡的表示然后从简单地计数简并能态。我们的概念新颖的方法是免费的数学模糊的概念,如合奏,随机性等,而且,虽然它甚至不依赖于概率,但它有助于理解它在量子世界中的作用。
扫码添加微信好友,提出您的宝贵建议 👇
💡 备注请填写:网站反馈
发表机构由 AI 从论文文本抽取,如发现错误,欢迎反馈修正建议。