arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2001.00571cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

Question Type Classification Methods Comparison

Stanford University(斯坦福大学)

Tamirlan Seidakhmetov

英文摘要:

The paper presents a comparative study of state-of-the-art approaches for question classification task: Logistic Regression, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory Network (LSTM) and Quasi-Recurrent Neural Networks (QRNN). All models use pre-trained GLoVe word embeddings and trained on human-labeled data. The best accuracy is achieved using CNN model with five convolutional layers and various kernel sizes stacked in parallel, followed by one fully connected layer. The model reached 90.7% accuracy on TREC 10 test set. All the model architectures in this paper were developed from scratch on PyTorch, in few cases based on reliable open-source implementation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑