arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1909.12475cs.LGstat.ML
收藏

隐藏分层导致医学成像机器学习中具有临床意义的失败

Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imaging

Australian Institute for Machine Learning(澳大利亚机器学习研究所);University of Adelaide(阿德莱德大学);Stanford University(斯坦福大学)

Luke Oakden-Rayner, Jared Dunnmon, Gustavo Carneiro, Christopher Ré

摘要:

用于医学图像分析的机器学习模型通常在训练或测试期间未识别的群体的重要子集上表现不佳。例如,癌症检测模型的整体性能可能很高,但该模型仍然始终错过罕见但侵袭性的癌症亚型。我们把这个问题称为隐藏分层,并观察到它是由于不完全描述数据集中有意义的变化而产生的。虽然隐藏分层可以大大降低机器学习模型的临床疗效,但其影响仍然难以衡量。在这项工作中,我们评估了几种可能的技术用于测量和描述隐藏的分层效应的实用性,并描述了这些效应对多个医学成像数据集的特征。我们发现证据表明,隐藏分层可能发生在未识别的成像亚组中,这些亚组具有低患病率、低标签质量、细微的区别特征或虚假相关性,并且它可能导致临床重要亚组的相对性能差异超过20%。最后,我们探讨了我们的研究结果的临床意义,并建议隐藏分层的评估应该是医学成像中任何机器学习部署的关键组成部分。

英文摘要:

Machine learning models for medical image analysis often suffer from poor performance on important subsets of a population that are not identified during training or testing. For example, overall performance of a cancer detection model may be high, but the model still consistently misses a rare but aggressive cancer subtype. We refer to this problem as hidden stratification, and observe that it results from incompletely describing the meaningful variation in a dataset. While hidden stratification can substantially reduce the clinical efficacy of machine learning models, its effects remain difficult to measure. In this work, we assess the utility of several possible techniques for measuring and describing hidden stratification effects, and characterize these effects on multiple medical imaging datasets. We find evidence that hidden stratification can occur in unidentified imaging subsets with low prevalence, low label quality, subtle distinguishing features, or spurious correlates, and that it can result in relative performance differences of over 20% on clinically important subsets. Finally, we explore the clinical implications of our findings, and suggest that evaluation of hidden stratification should be a critical component of any machine learning deployment in medical imaging.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑