arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1908.07709cs.CV

Are Registration Uncertainty and Error Monotonically Associated

Brigham and Women’s Hospital(布莱根妇女医院);Harvard Medical School(哈佛医学院);Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo(东京大学前沿科学研究生院);Department of Automation, Tsinghua University(清华大学自动化系);Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, RIKEN(理化学研究所先进智能项目中心)

Jie Luo, Sarah Frisken, Duo Wang, Alexandra Golby, Masashi Sugiyama, William M. Wells

英文摘要:

In image-guided neurosurgery, current commercial systems usually provide only rigid registration, partly because it is harder to predict, validate and understand non-rigid registration error. For instance, when surgeons see a discrepancy in aligned image features, they may not be able to distinguish between registration error and actual tissue deformation caused by tumor resection. In this case, the spatial distribution of registration error could help them make more informed decisions, e.g., ignoring the registration where the estimated error is high. However, error estimates are difficult to acquire. Probabilistic image registration (PIR) methods provide measures of registration uncertainty, which could be a surrogate for assessing the registration error. It is intuitive and believed by many clinicians that high uncertainty indicates a large error. However, the monotonic association between uncertainty and error has not been examined in image registration literature. In this pilot study, we attempt to address this fundamental problem by looking at one PIR method, the Gaussian process (GP) registration. We systematically investigate the relation between GP uncertainty and error based on clinical data and show empirically that there is a weak-to-moderate positive monotonic correlation between point-wise GP registration uncertainty and non-rigid registration error.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑