arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1908.06809cs.CLcs.LG
收藏

文本的风格转换:重新训练,报告错误,比较重写

Style Transfer for Texts: Retrain, Report Errors, Compare with Rewrites

Yandex(扬德斯克);Ural Federal University(乌拉尔联邦大学);Sberbank(俄罗斯联邦储蓄银行);Speech Technology Center(语音技术中心)

Alexey Tikhonov, Viacheslav Shibaev, Aleksander Nagaev, Aigul Nugmanova, Ivan P. Yamshchikov

摘要:

本文表明,风格迁移的标准评估方法有几个重要的问题。首先,样式准确性和语义保留的标准度量在不同的重新运行中有很大的不同。因此,必须报告所得结果的误差范围。第二,从输入和输出之间的双语评价替代(BLEU)和情感转移的准确性的某些值开始,这两个标准度量的优化偏离了风格转移任务的直观目标。最后,由于任务本身的性质,这两个指标之间存在特定的依赖关系,可以很容易地操纵。在这种情况下,我们建议在基准测试中考虑输入和人类书写的重新表述之间的BLEU。我们还提出了三个新的架构,在这个指标方面优于最先进的。

英文摘要:

This paper shows that standard assessment methodology for style transfer has several significant problems. First, the standard metrics for style accuracy and semantics preservation vary significantly on different re-runs. Therefore one has to report error margins for the obtained results. Second, starting with certain values of bilingual evaluation understudy (BLEU) between input and output and accuracy of the sentiment transfer the optimization of these two standard metrics diverge from the intuitive goal of the style transfer task. Finally, due to the nature of the task itself, there is a specific dependence between these two metrics that could be easily manipulated. Under these circumstances, we suggest taking BLEU between input and human-written reformulations into consideration for benchmarks. We also propose three new architectures that outperform state of the art in terms of this metric.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑