arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1908.05739cs.CL
收藏

溯因常识推理

Abductive Commonsense Reasoning

Allen Institute for AI(艾伦人工智能研究院);Facebook AI(脸书人工智能研究院);Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering(保罗·G·艾伦计算机科学与工程学院)

Chandra Bhagavatula, Ronan Le Bras, Chaitanya Malaviya, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Ari Holtzman, Hannah Rashkin, Doug Downey, Scott Wen-tau Yih, Yejin Choi

摘要:

溯因推理是对最合理解释的推理。例如,如果珍妮下班回家后发现家里一片狼借,她记得自己开着一扇窗户,她可以假设一个小偷闯入了她的房子,并造成了混乱,这是最合理的解释。虽然溯因一直被认为是人们如何解释和阅读自然语言字里行间的核心(Hobbs et al.,1988年),在支持溯因自然语言推理和生成方面的研究相对较少。我们提出的第一项研究,调查基于语言的溯因推理的可行性。我们引入了一个挑战数据集ART,它由超过20 k个常识性的叙事上下文和200 k个解释组成。基于这个数据集,我们概念化两个新的任务-(i)外展NLI:一个多项选择问答任务,选择更可能的解释,和(ii)外展NLG:一个条件生成任务,解释给定的观察自然语言。在外展NLI上,最佳模型的准确率为68.9%,远低于人类的91.4%。在外展NLG上,目前最好的语言生成器甚至更加挣扎,因为它们缺乏对人类来说微不足道的推理能力。我们的分析导致了对深度预训练的语言模型未能执行的推理类型的新见解-尽管它们在相关但定义更窄的NLI任务上表现出色-为未来的研究指明了有趣的途径。

英文摘要:

Abductive reasoning is inference to the most plausible explanation. For example, if Jenny finds her house in a mess when she returns from work, and remembers that she left a window open, she can hypothesize that a thief broke into her house and caused the mess, as the most plausible explanation. While abduction has long been considered to be at the core of how people interpret and read between the lines in natural language (Hobbs et al., 1988), there has been relatively little research in support of abductive natural language inference and generation. We present the first study that investigates the viability of language-based abductive reasoning. We introduce a challenge dataset, ART, that consists of over 20k commonsense narrative contexts and 200k explanations. Based on this dataset, we conceptualize two new tasks -- (i) Abductive NLI: a multiple-choice question answering task for choosing the more likely explanation, and (ii) Abductive NLG: a conditional generation task for explaining given observations in natural language. On Abductive NLI, the best model achieves 68.9% accuracy, well below human performance of 91.4%. On Abductive NLG, the current best language generators struggle even more, as they lack reasoning capabilities that are trivial for humans. Our analysis leads to new insights into the types of reasoning that deep pre-trained language models fail to perform--despite their strong performance on the related but more narrowly defined task of entailment NLI--pointing to interesting avenues for future research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑