arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2511.04020cs.CLcs.AI

检索增强语言模型中的溯因推理:生成与验证缺失前提

Abductive Inference in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models: Generating and Validating Missing Premises

  • Independent Researcher, Mountain View, CA94039, USA(独立研究者)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

Shiyin Lin

更新

AI总结:

本文提出将溯因推理集成到检索增强语言模型中,通过检测证据不足、生成并验证缺失前提,在多个基准上提升了答案准确性与推理忠实度。

AI中文摘要:

经过检索增强的大型语言模型(LLMs)——通常被称为检索增强生成(RAG)——在知识密集型任务中表现出了强大的性能。然而,当检索到的证据不完整时,RAG流程往往会出现失败,从而在推理过程中留下空白。在这种情况下,溯因推理——即生成合理的缺失前提以解释观察结果的过程——为弥合这些空白提供了一种有原则的方法。在本文中,我们提出了一个将溯因推理集成到检索增强LLMs中的框架。我们的方法检测证据不足的情况,生成候选缺失前提,并通过一致性和合理性检查对其进行验证。在溯因推理和多跳问答基准上的实验结果表明,我们的方法同时提高了答案准确性和推理忠实度。这项工作凸显了溯因推理作为增强RAG系统鲁棒性和可解释性的一个有前景的方向。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) enhanced with retrieval -- commonly referred to as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) -- have demonstrated strong performance in knowledge-intensive tasks. However, RAG pipelines often fail when retrieved evidence is incomplete, leaving gaps in the reasoning process. In such cases, \emph{abductive inference} -- the process of generating plausible missing premises to explain observations -- offers a principled approach to bridge these gaps. In this paper, we propose a framework that integrates abductive inference into retrieval-augmented LLMs. Our method detects insufficient evidence, generates candidate missing premises, and validates them through consistency and plausibility checks. Experimental results on abductive reasoning and multi-hop QA benchmarks show that our approach improves both answer accuracy and reasoning faithfulness. This work highlights abductive inference as a promising direction for enhancing the robustness and explainability of RAG systems.

↑