arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1902.11247cs.HC
收藏

基于众包和深度学习的移动界面可触性建模

Modeling Mobile Interface Tappability Using Crowdsourcing and Deep Learning

Amanda Swearngin, Yang Li

摘要:

点击是移动触摸屏界面中非常重要的手势,但人们仍然经常需要通过反复试验来了解哪些元素是可重复的。预测这种日常手势的人类行为可以帮助移动应用程序设计人员了解其应用程序可用性的一个重要方面,而无需进行用户研究。在本文中,我们提出了一种方法,在规模上的移动接口的可扩展性建模。我们使用众包对一组丰富的移动应用程序进行了大规模的界面可扩展性数据汇集,并通过计算研究了人们用来区分可扩展元素和不可扩展元素的各种意符。基于数据集,我们开发并训练了一个深度神经网络,该网络可以预测用户将界面元素感知为可扩展或不可扩展的可能性。使用经过训练的可扩展性模型,我们开发了TapShoe,这是一种工具,可以自动诊断人类用户所感知的每个元素的可扩展性(由我们的模型预测)与开发人员或设计人员指定的元素的预期或实际可扩展状态之间的不匹配。该模型在识别可识别的UI元素方面达到了合理的准确率:平均准确率为90.2%,召回率为87.0%。通过与7位专业交互设计师的非正式评估,设计师对可扩展性模型和TapShoe表示满意。

英文摘要:

Tapping is an immensely important gesture in mobile touchscreen interfaces, yet people still frequently are required to learn which elements are tappable through trial and error. Predicting human behavior for this everyday gesture can help mobile app designers understand an important aspect of the usability of their apps without having to run a user study. In this paper, we present an approach for modeling tappability of mobile interfaces at scale. We conducted large-scale data collection of interface tappability over a rich set of mobile apps using crowdsourcing and computationally investigated a variety of signifiers that people use to distinguish tappable versus not-tappable elements. Based on the dataset, we developed and trained a deep neural network that predicts how likely a user will perceive an interface element as tappable versus not tappable. Using the trained tappability model, we developed TapShoe, a tool that automatically diagnoses mismatches between the tappability of each element as perceived by a human user---predicted by our model, and the intended or actual tappable state of the element specified by the developer or designer. Our model achieved reasonable accuracy: mean precision 90.2\% and recall 87.0\%, in matching human perception on identifying tappable UI elements. The tappability model and TapShoe were well received by designers via an informal evaluation with 7 professional interaction designers.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑