arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1807.09652math.NAcs.NA
收藏

数值误差对PDE模型逆问题方法学的影响

The Influence of Numerical Error on an Inverse Problem Methodology in PDE Models

University of Colorado(科罗拉多大学)

John T. Nardini, D. M. Bortz

AI总结:

研究探讨了数值误差对PDE逆问题中参数估计和不确定性量化的影响,提出自相关统计模型以提升一阶方法的参数估计和置信区间计算。

摘要:

逆问题方法学是科学中用于参数估计和推断的常用框架,通常通过将数学模型拟合到有噪声的实验数据上。该过程中有两个显著的误差来源:1. 实验数据的测量和收集噪声,2. 近似真实解的数学模型时的数值误差。本文通过简单的对流驱动PDE模型进行建模和模拟研究,分析不同误差源对最小二乘成本函数、参数估计和不确定性量化的影响,并提出自相关统计模型以改进一阶方法的参数估计和置信区间计算。基于研究结果,本文为从业者提供了判断数值或实验误差为主要误差源的指南,并提出了提高结果效率的建议。

英文摘要:

The inverse problem methodology is a commonly-used framework in the sciences for parameter estimation and inference. It is typically performed by fitting a mathematical model to noisy experimental data. There are two significant sources of error in the process: 1.\ Noise from the measurement and collection of experimental data and 2.\ numerical error in approximating the true solution to the mathematical model. Little attention has been paid to how this second source of error alters the results of an inverse problem. As a first step towards a better understanding of this problem, we present a modeling and simulation study using a simple advection-driven PDE model. We present both analytical and computational results concerning how the different sources of error impact the least squares cost function as well as parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification. We investigate residual patterns to derive an autocorrelative statistical model that can improve parameter estimation and confidence interval computation for first order methods. Building on the results of our investigation, we provide guidelines for practitioners to determine when numerical or experimental error is the main source of error in their inference, along with suggestions of how to efficiently improve their results.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑