arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1712.02494cs.CVcs.AIcs.GRcs.LG
收藏

欺骗检测器的对抗性示例

Adversarial Examples that Fool Detectors

University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign(伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校)

Jiajun Lu, Hussein Sibai, Evan Fabry

摘要:

对抗性示例是在测试时被调整为在系统中呈现时产生错误标签的示例。到目前为止,对抗性的例子构造已经被证明用于分类器,但不是用于检测器。如果存在可以欺骗检测器的对抗性示例,则它们可以用于(例如)在智能车辆密集的道路上恶意制造安全隐患。在本文中,我们展示了一个成功欺骗两个标准检测器Faster RCNN和YOLO的构造。这样的例子的存在是令人惊讶的,因为攻击分类器与攻击检测器是非常不同的,而且检测器的结构-必须搜索自己的限界框,并且不能非常准确地估计该框-使得对抗模式很可能被强烈破坏。我们表明,我们的构造产生了对抗性的例子,这些例子在数字序列中具有很好的泛化能力,即使需要大的扰动。我们还表明,我们的建设产生的物理对象是敌对的。

英文摘要:

An adversarial example is an example that has been adjusted to produce a wrong label when presented to a system at test time. To date, adversarial example constructions have been demonstrated for classifiers, but not for detectors. If adversarial examples that could fool a detector exist, they could be used to (for example) maliciously create security hazards on roads populated with smart vehicles. In this paper, we demonstrate a construction that successfully fools two standard detectors, Faster RCNN and YOLO. The existence of such examples is surprising, as attacking a classifier is very different from attacking a detector, and that the structure of detectors - which must search for their own bounding box, and which cannot estimate that box very accurately - makes it quite likely that adversarial patterns are strongly disrupted. We show that our construction produces adversarial examples that generalize well across sequences digitally, even though large perturbations are needed. We also show that our construction yields physical objects that are adversarial.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑