认识论的量子力学基础
Quantum Mechanical Foundations of Epistemology
AI总结：
本文针对“去殖民化科学形态”的问题，审视经典物理学观测表述假设，对比经典分析与前殖民知识体系的差异，提出未被殖民的知识体系具有认识论多元性的结论。
摘要：
科学史与科学哲学领域的学者一直在探究去殖民化的科学会是什么样的形态。本文通过审视“观测结果必须使用经典物理学的语言来记录与传播”这一假设，给出了相应的解答。尼尔斯·玻尔（Niels Bohr）即便意识到量子现象无法用经典思路分析，仍秉持这一假设。经典分析要求将所有被观测对象客体化，以便对其进行客观描述，这种分析内在地构建出一种先验真理的智识产物，即一种“无立场视角”。与之形成对比的是，早于欧洲殖民主义存在的知识体系，在不构建客观模型的前提下，利用了自然的量子特性。本文得出结论：未被殖民的知识体系与经典知识体系的区别在于，前者在认识论上具有多元性，能够接受对同一现象的多种真实观测结果。
英文摘要：
Scholars of the history and philosophy of science have asked what would decolonized science would look like. This paper develops an answer by interrogating the assumption that observations need to be recorded and communicated using the language of classical physics. Niels Bohr held this assumption even though he recognized the fact that quantum phenomena cannot be analyzed on classical lines. Classical analysis requires the objectification of whatever is being observed so that it can be objectively described. Inherent in this analysis is the intellectual creation of a transcendental verity, a view from nowhere. In contrast, knowledge systems that predate European colonialism make use of the quantum nature of nature without constructing an objective model of it. This paper concludes that uncolonized knowledge systems differ from classical ones in that they are epistemically plural, accepting multiple true observations of the same phenomenon.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
