通过对6个关键开放存档元目录的分析，了解OAI-PMH存储库的全球情况
Global picture of OAI-PMH repositories through the analysis of 6 key open archive meta-catalogs
摘要：
到90年代末，开放档案计划需要方向来确保其改进，因此创建了开放档案计划元数据收集协议（OAI-PMH）标准。该运动的受欢迎程度先是上升，然后下降，然后相对稳定。这一进程基本上是确保开放档案库可行性的一种方式。然而，一个元目录包含一个集合的储存库从来没有建立，这导致了混乱，什么可以在所说的目录中找到。这项研究的最终目的是找出什么存储库的内容可以找到，在哪里使用的6个关键元目录。虽然它们无疑有许多与可用数据有关的限制，但本文试图比较每个元目录中的公共数据，并估计在其中找到的存储库（大约有100个）。在6个元目录内共同的少于1%）。决定性的，本文确定了需要整理这些数据（共有42.3%的OAI-PMH存储库特定于每个元目录），并改善当前的搜索工具，从而描绘了一个可理解的单一的统一元目录的最终用户的好处。
英文摘要：
By the end of the late 90's the Open Archives Initiative needed direction to insure its improvement and thus, created the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) standard. The movement showed a rise in popularity, followed by a decline then a relative stabilization. This process was essentially a way to ensure the viability of open archive repositories. However, a meta-catalog containing an ensemble of repositories was never established, which lead to confusion of what could be found in said catalogs. This study ultimately aims to find out what repository content can be found and where with the use of the 6 key meta-catalogs. Although they undoubtedly have numerous limitations pertaining to the available data, this article seeks to compare the common data in each meta-catalog and estimates which repositories are found within them (with approx. less than 1% in common within the 6 meta-catalog). Decisively, this paper identifies the need to collate this data (with a total of 42.3% OAI-PMH repositories specific to each meta-catalog) and improve current search tools, hence portraying the benefits of a comprehensible single unifying meta-catalog for end users.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
